In 11-dimensional supergravity the brane electrically charged under the supergravity C-field is the M2-brane/membrane. The dual under electric-magnetic duality is the M5-brane.
the worldvolume theory of the M5-brane is the 6d (2,0)-superconformal QFT.
This worldvolume theory involves self-dual higher gauge theory of the nonabelian kind (Witten07, Witten09): the fields are supposed to be connections on a 2-bundle( gerbe), presumably with structure 2-group the automorphism 2-group of some Lie group .
For instance in the proposal of (SSW11) one sees in equation (2.1) almost the data of an -Lie 2-algebra valued forms.
On dimensional reduction of 11-dimensional supergravity on a circle the M5-brane turns into the NS5-brane and the D4-brane of type II string theory.
The AdS/CFT correspondence for the 5-brane is and relates the 6d (2,0)-superconformal QFT to 7-dimensional supergravity obtained by reduction of 11-dimensional supergravity on o 4-sphere to an and asymptotically 7d anti de Sitter spacetime.
The self-dual 2-connection-field (see there for more details) on the 6-dimensional worldvolume M5-brane is supposed to have a holographic description in terms of a 7-dimensional Chern-Simons theory (Witten 1996). We discuss the relevant “fractional” quadratic form on ordinary differential cohomology that defines the correct action functional.
Let be the circle 3-bundle with connection on a 7-dimensional manifold with boundary the M5-brane, thought of as the compactification of the supergravity C-field from 11-dimensional supergravity down to 7-dimensional supergravity.
As discussed there, the 7-dimensional Chern-Simons theory action functional on these 3-connections is
where
is the higher holonomy / fiber integration in ordinary differential cohomology from to the point
The space of states of this 7d theory on the M5 worldvolume would be the space of conformal blocks of the 6d (2,0)-supersymmetric QFT on the worldvolume.
Except, that it turns out that the first Chern class of the corresponding prequantum line bundle is twice that required from geometric quantization.
Therefore the above action functional is not yet the correct one, but only a fractional version of it is. However, the class in integral cohomology has in general no reason to be divisible by 2.
This is related to the fact that as a quadratic form on the ordinary differential cohomology group , the above is not a quadratic refinement of
but of twice that. In (Witten 1996) it was argued, and later clarified in (Hopkins-Singer), that instead the action functional should be replaced by a proper quadratic refinement.
This is accomplished by shifting the center of the quadratic form by a lift of the degree-4 Wu class from 0 to .
(For that to make sense in integral cohomology, either the Wu class happens to be divisible by 2 on , or else one has to regard it itself as a twisted differential character of sorts, as explained in (Hopkins-Singer). For the moment we will assume that is such that is divisbible by 2.)
Since , being a spacetime for supergravity, admits (and is thought to be equipped with) a spin structure, by the discussion at Wu class it follows that is the first fractional Pontryagin class
By the very definition of Wu class, it follows that for any the combination
is divisible by 2.
Therefore define then the modified quadratic form
(see differential string structure for the definition of the differential refinement ), where, note, we have included a global factor of 2, which is now possible due to the inclusion of the integral lift of the Wu class.
Notice that where the equations of motion of the original action functional are , those of this shifted one are . One may therefor calls here a background charge for the 7-d Chern-Simons theory.
This is now indeed a quadratic refinement of the intersection pairing:
To express the correct action functional for the 7d Chern-Simons theory it is useful to define the shifted supergravity C-field
which the object whose equations of motion with respect to the 7d Chern-Simons theory are still .
Then in terms of the original the action functional for the holographic dual 7d Chern-Simons theory reads
This is the action as it appears in (Witten96, (3.6)).
In terms of twisted differential c-structures we may summarize the outcome of this reasoning as follows:
The divisibility of the action functional requires a -twisted Wu structure in -cohomology. Its lift to integral cohomology is the -twisted differential string structure known as the “Witten quantization condition” on the supergravity C-field.
We discuss the conditions on the restriction of the supergravity C-field on the ambient 11-dimensional supergravity spacetime to the M5-brane.
This is similar to the analogous situation in type II string theory. The the Freed-Witten anomaly cancellation condition demands that the restriction of the B-field on spacetime to an oriented D-brane has to trivialize, up to torsion, relative to the integral Stiefel-Whitney class , where is the Bockstein homomorphism induced from the short exact sequence :
thus defining a twisted spin^c-structure on the D-brane.
The analog of this for the M5-brane is discussed in (Witten00, section 5). There it is argued that there is a class
on the 5-brane such that under the Bockstein homomorphism induced by the short exact sequence we have for the supergravity C-field the condition
By the above quantization condition, this may also be thought of as witnessing a twisted string structure on the 5-brane (Sati).
This condition reduces to the above one for the -field under double dimensional reduction on the circle.
Table of branes appearing in supergravity/string theory
A review of some aspects is in
Sigma model description of the (single) M5-brane are discussed for Green-Schwarz action functional-type setups in
Igor Bandos, Kurt Lechner, Alexei Nurmagambetov, Paolo Pasti, Dmitri Sorokin, Mario Tonin, Covariant Action for the Super-Five-Brane of M-Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 4332-4334 (arXiv:hep-th/9701149)
Mina Aganagic, Jaemo Park, Costin Popescu, John Schwarz, World-Volume Action of the M Theory Five-Brane (arXiv:hep-th/9701166)
Dmitri Sorokin, Superbranes and Superembeddings (arXiv:hep-th/9906142)
A compariso of the different actions here is in
A review with emphasis on the coupling to the M2-brane is in
The double dimensional reduction of the M5-brane to the D4-brane in type II string theory is discussed in
The original article suggesting the description of the self-dual higher gauge theory on the 5-brane holographically by a dual higher dimensional Chern-Simons theory is
A precise mathematical formulation of the proposal made there is given in
A discussion that embeds this argument into the larger context of AdS-CFT duality is in
See also the references at 6d (2,0)-supersymmetric QFT.
The double dimensional reduction to the D4-brane D=5 super Yang-Mills theory and the relation to Khovanov homology is discussed in
with further comments in
The relation of the M5-brane to the D4-brane and the D=5 super Yang-Mills theory in its worldvolume theory by double dimensional reduction is discussed in the following references
Malcolm Perry, John Schwarz, Interacting Chiral Gauge Fields in Six Dimensions and Born-Infeld Theory, Nucl. Phys. B489 (1997) 47-64 (arXiv:hep-th/9611065)
Neil Lambert, Constantinos Papageorgakis, Maximilian Schmidt-Sommerfeld, M5-Branes, D4-Branes and Quantum 5D super-Yang-Mills, JHEP 1101:083 (2011) (arXiv:1012.2882)
See also (Witten 11).
The anti de Sitter spacetime arises in 11-dimensional supergravity as the large limit of coincident M5-branes:
P. Pasti, Dmitri Sorokin and M. Tonin, Covariant Action for a D=11 Five-Brane with the Chiral Field, Phys.Lett. B398 (1997) 41.
I. Bandos, K. Lechner, A. Nurmagambetov, P. Pasti, Dmitri Sorokin and M. Tonin, Covariant Action for the Super-Five-Brane of M-Theory, Phys.Rev.Lett. 78 (1997) 4332.
M. Aganagic, J. Park, C. Popescu and John Schwarz, World-Volume Action of the M Theory Five-Brane, Nucl.Phys. B496 (1997) 191.
The fact that the worldvolume theory of the M5-brane should support fields that are self-dual connections on a 2-bundle ( a gerbe) is discussed in
as well as sections 3 and 4 of
Proposals for how to implement this are for instance in
Chong-Sun Chu, A Theory of Non-Abelian Tensor Gauge Field with Non-Abelian Gauge Symmetry (arXiv:1108.5131)
Henning Samtleben, Ergin Sezgin, Robert Wimmer, (1,0) superconformal models in six dimensions (arXiv:1108.4060)
A formal proposal is here.