abstract duality: opposite category,
concrete duality: dual object, dualizable object, fully dualizable object, dualizing object
between higher geometry/higher algebra
Langlands duality, geometric Langlands duality, quantum geometric Langlands duality
The term double field theory has come to be used for field theory (prequantum field theory/quantum field theory) on spacetimes which are T-folds (doubled geometries) hence for “T-duality-equivariant field theory”.
The most popular proposal of formalization of double field theory is in the context of para-Hermitian geometry.
The use of para-hermitian geometry in Double Field Theory was introduced by Izu Vaisman in (Vai 12), then by David Svoboda (Svo 18).
An almost para-complex manifold is a manifold $M$ equipped with a vector bundle endomorphism $F\in\mathrm{End}(T M)$ such that $F^2=1$ and its $\pm 1$ eigenbundles $T^\pm M$ have same rank.
The para-complex projectors are the canonical projectors onto $T^\pm M$ defined by $P_\pm = \frac{1}{2}(1\pm F)$
A $\pm$-para-complex manifold is an almost para-complex manifold $(M,F)$ such that $T^\pm M$ of $F$ is Frobenius integrable as a distribution. A para-complex manifold is a manifold that is both $+$-para-complex and $-$-para-complex.
A doubled manifold $M$ equipped with the $O(d,d)$-structure $\eta$ carries a natural almost para-hermitian structure. On patches $U$ with coordinates $(x^\mu,\tilde{x}_\mu)$ we have the canonical para-complex structure
with eigenbundles
$T^+U=\big\langle\frac{\partial}{\partial x^\mu}\big\rangle$,
$T^-U=\big\langle\frac{\partial}{\partial \tilde{x}_\mu}\big\rangle$,
with associated foliations
$\mathcal{F}_+=\{x^\mu = \mathrm{const}\}$,
$\mathcal{F}_-=\{\tilde{x}_\mu = \mathrm{const}\}$.
In analogy with complex geometry, if we define $\Omega^{r,s}(M)$ as the space of sections of $\Lambda^r(T^+M)\wedge\Lambda^s(T^-M)$, we have the decomposition
Let us call $\pi^{r,s}:\Omega^{r+s}(M)\rightarrow\Omega^{r,s}(M)$ the canonical projector induced by $P_\pm$.
In analogy with complex geometry, there are para-Dolbeault operators:
$\mathrm{d}^+=\pi^{r+1,s}\circ\mathrm{d} : \Omega^{r,s}(M)\longrightarrow \Omega^{r+1,s}(M)$,
$\mathrm{d}^-=\pi^{r,s+1}\circ\mathrm{d} : \Omega^{r,s}(M)\longrightarrow \Omega^{r,s+1}(M)$.
with properties:
$\mathrm{d} = \mathrm{d}^+ + \mathrm{d}^-$,
$(\mathrm{d}^\pm)^2= 0$,
$\mathrm{d}^+\mathrm{d}^-+\mathrm{d}^-\mathrm{d}^+ =0$.
We can also define Lie derivatives on the eigenbundles $T^\pm M$ by
for any vector $X_\pm\in\Gamma(T^\pm M)$ and $\xi\in\Omega^{r,s}(M)$.
An almost para-hermitian manifold is an almost para-complex manifold $M$ equipped with a compatible metric, i.e a symmetric tensor $\eta\in\mathrm{Sym}^2(T M)$ such that $\eta(F\cdot\,,F\cdot\,)=-\eta(\,\cdot\,,\,\cdot\,)$.
The contraction with the metric $\eta$ defines two isomorphisms
by
$\phi^\pm(X_\pm) = X_\pm^\flat$ and
$(\phi^\pm)^{-1}(\xi_\pm)=\xi^\sharp$
that map a vector in $T^\pm M$ to a $1$-form in $(T^\mp M)^\ast$ and vice-versa. We used the notation $\flat,\sharp$ for the musical isomorphisms induced by the metric $\eta$ between $T M$ and $T^\ast M$.
This can be used to define a new couple of isomorphisms
that maps a vector a vector $X=X_++X_-$ with $X_\pm\in T^\pm M$ into $X_+ + X_-^\flat$.
A para-hermitian manifold is an almost para-hermitian manifold $(M,\eta,F)$ such that $(M,F)$ is a para-complex manifold.
Given a $+$-para-hermitian manifold $(M,\eta,F)$, consider the triple $\big(T^+ M,[\,\cdot\,,\,\cdot\,]_+,1_{T^+M}\big)$ where
the skew-symmetric bracket $[\,\cdot\,,\,\cdot\,]_+:=[\,\cdot\,,\,\cdot\,]|_{T^+ M}$
the anchor $1_{T^\pm M}:=1_{T M}|_{T^\pm M}$ are the restrictions of Lie bracket and identity of $T M$.
Since $M$ is $+$-para-hermitian we have that $T^+M$ is integrable and therefore it is the tangent bundle $T^+M = T\mathcal{F}_\pm$ of a foliation $\mathcal{F}_+$. This means that this triple is just the tangent Lie algebroid of the foliation $\mathcal{F}_+$:
There is a natural Courant algebroid structure on the bundle $T^+ M\oplus(T^+ M)^\ast$ with skew-symmetric pairing
and symmetric pairing
The isomorphism $\Phi^+:T^+ M\oplus (T^+ M)^\ast\rightarrow T^+ M\oplus T^- M = T M$ previously defined induces a Courant algebroid isomorphism and hence a Courant algebroid structure on $T M$. This induces a metric $\eta$ on $M$ and a skew-symmetric pairing on $T M$ by
where $X\in T M$ is split in $X_\pm=P_\pm X$.
Since $M$ is assumed $+$-para-hermitian, $T^+ M\oplus (T^+ M)^\ast$ can be written as $T\mathcal{F}_+\oplus T^\ast\mathcal{F}_+$. Therefore we constructed an isomorphism between the Courant algebroid on the whole $T M$ and the generalized tangent bundle $T\mathcal{F}_+\oplus T^\ast\mathcal{F}_+$ of the foliation. In other terms para-hermitian geometry of the doubled manifold $M$ reduces to Generalized Geometry of physical spacetime.
The same argument can be clearly applied to $T^-M$ too.
In previous section we assumed that the $+1$-eigenbundle $T^+M$ is integrable. This is equivalent to assuming that there exists a well defined foliation that can be interpreted as the physical spacetime. However it is possible to construct a more general bracket that does not require such an assumption, but only an almost para-complex structure. Therefore it works even when a global physical spacetime foliation is not defined. This is achieved by Vaisman with the definition of C-bracket by using a generalization of the notion of Levi-Civita connection (look (Vai 2012)).
In the special case of an (integrable) para-hermitian manifold C-bracket is given by
where $[\,\cdot\,,\,\cdot\,]$, $\mathcal{L}_X$ and $\mathrm{d}$ are usual Lie bracket, Lie derivative and differential on $T\mathcal{F}_+$. On the other hand $[\,\cdot\,,\,\cdot\,]^\ast$, $\mathcal{L}^\ast_\alpha$ and $\mathrm{d}^\ast$ are Lie bracket, Lie derivative and differential on $T\mathcal{F}_+^\ast$ induced by the former ones.
The analogy between geometric quantization and DFT was firstly noticed by David Berman.
Given a symplectic manifold $(M,\omega)$ there exist couples of lagrangian foliations $\mathcal{F}_+,\mathcal{F}_-$ of $M$ defined by
For example for a symplectic space $(\mathbb{R}^{2d},\omega=\mathrm{d}x^\mu\wedge\mathrm{d}p_\mu)$ we can have $\mathcal{F}_+ = \{x^\mu = \mathrm{const} \}$ and $\mathcal{F}_-= \{p_\mu = \mathrm{const} \}$. But notice that any symplectic rotation of this choice is a couple of lagrangian foliations that works fine.
Heuristically, in geometrical quantization we make a choice of a couple of lagrangian foliations $\mathcal{F}_\pm$ to “select” a physical spacetime $\mathcal{F}_+$ from the whole symplectic-covariant theory on $M$.
Similarly in DFT, when $M$ is an (integrable) para-hermitian manifold we make a choice of a couple of lagrangian foliations $\mathcal{F}_\pm$ to “select” a physical spacetime $\mathcal{F}_+$ from the whole T-duality-covariant theory on $M$.
Let us start from a bundle gerbe $\pi:P\rightarrow M$ on a $d$-dimensional smooth manifold $M$. This is locally isomorphic to $P|_U \cong U\times \mathbf{B}U(1)$, where $\mathbf{B}U(1)$ is the circle 2-group and $U$ is an open set. If we consider an atlas $\mathbb{R}^d\rightarrow U$, we immediately have an atlas $\mathbb{R}^d\times \mathbf{B}U(1)\rightarrow U\times \mathbf{B}U(1)$ which extends the former. In other words the bundle gerbe is locally modelled on the Lie 2-group $\mathbb{R}^d\times \mathbf{B}U(1)$.
The Lie 2-algebra of $\mathbb{R}^d\times \mathbf{B}U(1)$ is $\mathbb{R}^d \oplus \mathbf{b}\mathfrak{u}(1)$. An atlas for this Lie 2-algebra will be just an ordinary Lie algebra $\mathfrak{a}$ and a homomorphism of Lie n-algebras
which is surjective in the lowest degree. What choice of $\mathfrak{a}$ can we make?
To find a working atlas we can consider the dual homomorphism of Chevalley-Eilenberg algebras, i.e. the injective homomorphism
The dg-algebra $\mathrm{CE}(\mathbb{R}^d \oplus \mathbf{b}\mathfrak{u}(1))$ has a degree $2$ generator $b$ which is annihilated by the differential, i.e. $\mathrm{d} b=0$. Therefore its image $\omega := f^\ast b$ in $\mathfrak{a}$ is a of degree $2$ element which satisfies the equation
Since $\mathbb{R}^d$ must be a subalgebra of $\mathfrak{a}$ and $\omega$ must be rotation-invariant, we have no other choice than $\mathfrak{a}=\mathbb{R}^d \oplus (\mathbb{R}^d)^\ast$ and
where $\mathrm{d}\tilde{x}_\mu$ and $\mathrm{d}x^\mu$ are respectively generators of $\mathrm{CE}((\mathbb{R}^d)^\ast)$ and $\mathrm{CE}(\mathbb{R}^d)$.
The vector space $\mathbb{R}^d \oplus (\mathbb{R}^d)^\ast$ equipped with $\omega = \mathrm{d}\tilde{x}_\mu \wedge \mathrm{d}x^\mu \in \Omega_{\mathrm{LI}}^1(\mathbb{R}^d \oplus (\mathbb{R}^d)^\ast)$ is nothing but the local space on which para-Hermitian geometry is modelled. On the other side of the atlas map $f: \mathfrak{a} \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}^d \oplus \mathbf{b}\mathfrak{u}(1)$ we have an extended Minkowski spacetime, on which bundle gerbes are modelled.
This relation is introduced in (Alf20).
Double field theory is supposed to formalize the non-geometric backgrounds of type II string theory.
The idea of “doubled spacetime geometry” is a variant of the idea of T-folds, due to
The coinage of the term “double field theory” for field theory on such doubled geometry goes back to
Discussion about para-Hermitian formalism started in
Para-Hermitian formalism further developed and generalized in
Discussion of double field theory using higher differential geometry:
Discussion in the context of L-infinity algebra includes
Discussion of an extended version of Riemannian geometry suitable for the description of double field theory
Comprehensive discussion in higher differential geometry:
Luigi Alfonsi, Global Double Field Theory is Higher Kaluza-Klein Theory, Fortsch. d. Phys. 2020 (arXiv:1912.07089, doi:10.1002/prop.202000010)
(relating Kaluza-Klein compactification on principal ∞-bundles to double field theory, T-folds, non-abelian T-duality, type II geometry, exceptional geometry, …)
Luigi Alfonsi, The puzzle of global Double Field Theory: open problems and the case for a Higher Kaluza-Klein perspective (arXiv:2007.04969)
Luigi Alfonsi, Towards an extended/higher correspondence – Generalised geometry, bundle gerbes and global Double Field Theory (arXiv:2102.10970)
Last revised on February 22, 2021 at 22:20:37. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.