Types of quantum field thories
The space of density matrices inside all suitable endomorphisms is called the Bloch region.
In the following definition, we use Dirac’s “bra-ket” notation for vectors where a state vector, describing a pure state of a quantum system, is represented by a “ket” which is a column vector,
The Hermitian adjoint, , is called a “bra” (hence “bra(c)ket”) and is a row vector.
Suppose we have a quantum state that arises from some random process such that the state has a probability (we often speak of having ‘prepared’ the state with the associated probability). The possible states need not be orthogonal and we thus call such a collection of states a mixed state. More specifically, a mixed state is often described as an ensemble? of quantum systems.
Suppose we now measure some observable on the system as a whole, i.e. on the ensemble. The expectation value of over the state is . Over the entire ensemble, this becomes
Given the above, we define the density operator to be
An operator is the density operator associated to some ensemble if and only if it is a positive operator with trace 1. (Nielsen and Chuang Theorem 2.5, p. 101)
Diagonal density matrices with at least two non-zero terms on the diagonal represent mixed states. Density matrices that posses non-zero off-diagonal terms represent superposition states. Such states are referred to as coherent and the off-diagonal entries are called the coherences. Any physical process that has the effect of suppressing the coherences is known as decoherence.
Note that a density operator, as the representation of the state of a quantum system, is less restrictive than a state vector which specifies the wavefunction. On the other hand, two different state vectors can give rise to the same density operator. However, in that case, the two vectors are the same up to a phase, so arguably the density operator still describes the physical state unambiguously.
More controversially, two entirely different probabilisitic combinations of state vectors can give rise to the same density operator. Roger Penrose, for one, has argued that this means that that the density operator does not describe mixed states unambiguously. But one can also argue the reverse: that mixed states with the same operator really are the same physical state, since they are observationally indistinguishable.
Nielsen, M, and Chuang, I. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.
Schumacher, B. and Westmoreland, M. Q-PSI: Quantum Processes, Systems, and Information, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.