nLab
bundle gerbe

Context

Bundles

Cohomology

cohomology

Special and general types

Special notions

Variants

Extra structure

Operations

Theorems

Contents

Idea

A bundle gerbe is a special model for the total space Lie groupoid of a BU(1)-principal 2-bundle for BU(1) the circle 2-group.

More generally, for G a more general Lie 2-group (often taken to be the automorphism 2-group G=AUT(H) of a Lie group H), a nonabelian bundle gerbe for G is a model for the total space groupoid of a G-principal 2-bundle.

The definition of bundle gerbe is not in fact a special case (nor a generalization) of the definition of gerbe, even though there are equivalences relating both concepts.

Definition

A bundle gerbe’* over a smooth manifold X is

  • a surjective submersion

    Y π X\array{ Y \\ \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\pi}} \\ X }
  • together with a U(1)-principal bundle

    L p Y× XY\array{ L \\ \downarrow^{\mathrlap{p}} \\ Y \times_X Y }

    over the fiber product of Y with itself, i.e.

    L p Y× XY π 2π 1 Y π X,\array{ L \\ \downarrow^{\mathrlap{p}} \\ Y \times_X Y &\stackrel{\overset{\pi_1}{\rightarrow}}{\underset{\pi_2}{\rightarrow}}& Y \\ && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\pi}} \\ && X } \,,
  • an isomorphism

    μ:π 12 *Lπ 23 *Lπ 13 *L\mu : \pi_{12}^*L \otimes \pi_{23}^*L \to \pi_{13}^* L

    of U(1)-bundles on Y× XY× XY

  • such that this satisfies the evident associativity condition on Y× XY× XY× XY.

Here π 12,π 23,π 13 are the three maps

Y [3]Y [2]Y^{[3]} \stackrel{\stackrel{\rightarrow}{\rightarrow}}{\rightarrow} Y^{[2]}

in the Cech nerve of YX.

In a nonabelian bundle gerbe the bundle L is generalized to a bibundle.

Interpretation

A bundle gerbe may be understood as a specific model for the total space Lie groupoid of a principal 2-bundle.

We first describe this Lie groupoid in

and then describe how this is the total space of a principal 2-bundle in

As a groupoid extension

Give a surjective submersion π:YX, write

C(Y):=(Y× XYY)C(Y) := \left( Y \times_X Y \stackrel{\to}{\to} Y \right)

for the corresponding Cech groupoid. Notice that this is a resolution of the smooth manifold X itself, in that the canonical projection is a weak equivalence (see infinity-Lie groupoid for details)

C(Y) X.\array{ C(Y) \\ \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\simeq}} \\ X } \,.

The data of a bundle gerbe (Y,L,μ) induces a Lie groupoid P (Y,L,μ) which is a BU(1)-extension of C(Y), exhibiting a fiber sequence

BU(1)P (Y,L,μ)X.\mathbf{B}U(1) \to P_{(Y,L,\mu)} \to X \,.

This Lie groupoid is the groupoid whose space of morphisms is the total space L of the U(1)-bundle

P (Y,L,μ)=(Lπ 2pπ 1pY)P_{(Y,L,\mu)} = \left( L \stackrel{\overset{\pi_1 \circ p}{\to}}{\underset{\pi_2 \circ p}{\to}} Y \right)

with composition given by the composite

L× s,tLπ 12 *L×π 23 3*Lπ 12 *Lπ 23 3*Lμπ 13 *LL.L \times_{s,t} L \stackrel{\simeq}{\to} \pi_{12}^* L \times \pi_{23}^3* L \stackrel{}{\to} \pi_{12}^* L \otimes \pi_{23}^3* L \stackrel{\mu}{\to} \pi_{13}^* L \to L \,.

As the total space of a principal 2-bundle

We discuss how a bundle gerbe, regarded as a groupoid, is the total space of a BU(1)-principal 2-bundles.

Recall from the discussion at principal infinity-bundle that the total G 2-bundle space PX classified by a cocycle XBG is simply the homotopy fiber of that cocycle. This we compute now.

(For more along these lines see infinity-Chern-Weil theory introduction. For the analogous nonabelian case see also nonabelian bundle gerbe.)

Proposition

The Lie groupoid P (Y,L,μ) defined by a bundle gerbe is in ∞LieGrpd the (∞,1)-pullback

P (Y,L,μ) * X g B 2U(1)\array{ P_{(Y,L,\mu)} &\to& * \\ \downarrow &\swArrow_{\simeq}& \downarrow \\ X &\stackrel{g}{\to}& \mathbf{B}^2 U(1) }

of a cocycle [g]H(X,B 2U(1))H 3(X,).

In fact a somewhat stronger statement is true, as shown in the following proof.

Proof

We can assume without restriction that the bundle L in the data of the bundle gerbe is actually the trivial U(1)-bundle L=Y× XY×U(1) by refining, if necessary, the surjective submersion Y by a good open cover. In that case we may identify μ with a U(1)-valued function

μ:Y× XY× XYU(1)\mu : Y \times_X Y \times_X Y \to U(1)

which in turn we may identify with a smooth 2-anafunctor

C(U) μ B 2U(1) X.\array{ C(U) &\stackrel{\mu}{\to}& \mathbf{B}^2 U(1) \\ \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\simeq}} \\ X } \,.

From here on the computation is a special case of the general theory of groupoid cohomology and the extensions classified by it.

Then recall from universal principal infinity-bundle that we model the (,1)-pullbacks that defines principal -bundles in terms of ordinary pullbacks of the universal BU(1)-principal 2-bundle EBU(1)B 2U(1).

We may model all this in the case at hand in terms of strict 2-groupoips. Then using an evident cartoon-notation we have

B 2U(1)={ cU(1) }\mathbf{B}^2 U(1) = \left\{ \array{ & \nearrow \searrow \\ \bullet &\Downarrow^{\mathrlap{c \in U(1)}}& \bullet \\ & \searrow \nearrow } \right\}

and EBU(1) is the 2-groupoid whose morphisms are diagrams

c \array{ && \bullet \\ & \nearrow &\swArrow_{c}& \searrow \\ \bullet &&\to&& \bullet }

in B 2U(1) with composition given by horizontal pasting

c 1 c 2 \array{ &&& \bullet \\ & \swarrow &\swArrow_{c_1} & \downarrow &\swArrow_{c_2}& \searrow \\ \bullet &\to&& \bullet &&\to& \bullet }

and 2-morphisms are paper-cup diagrams

c k = ck .\array{ && \bullet \\ & \nearrow &\swArrow_{c}& \searrow \\ \bullet &&\to&& \bullet \\ & \searrow &\swArrow_{k}& \swarrow \\ && \bullet } \;\;\;\;\; = \;\;\;\;\; \array{ && \bullet \\ & \nearrow &\swArrow_{c k}& \searrow \\ \bullet &&\to&& \bullet } \,.

So EBU(1) is the Lie 2-groupoid with a single object, with U(1) worth of 1-morphisms and unique 2-morphism between these.

From this we read of that

P (Y,L,μ) EBU(1) C(U) μ B 2U(1) X\array{ P_{(Y,L,\mu)} &\to& \mathbf{E} \mathbf{B}U(1) \\ \downarrow && \downarrow \\ C(U) &\stackrel{\mu}{\to}& \mathbf{B}^2 U(1) \\ \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\simeq}} \\ X }

is indeed a pullback square (in the category of simplicial presheaves over CartSp). The morphisms of the pullback Lie groupoid are pairs of diagrams

c (x,i) (x,j)\array{ && \bullet \\ & \nearrow &\swArrow_{c}& \searrow \\ \bullet &&\to&& \bullet \\ \\ (x,i) &&\to&& (x,j) }

hence form a trivial U(1)-bundle over the morphisms of C(U), and the 2-morphims are pairs consisting of 2-morphisms

(x,j) (x,i) (x,k)\array{ && (x,j) \\ & \nearrow &\swArrow& \searrow \\ (x,i) &&\to&& (x,k) }

in C(U) and paper-cup diagrams of the form

c 1 c 2 μ ijk(x) = c 1c 2μ ijk(x) \array{ &&& \bullet \\ & \swarrow &\swArrow_{c_1} & \downarrow &\swArrow_{c_2}& \searrow \\ \bullet &\to&& \bullet &&\to& \bullet \\ & \searrow &&\swArrow_{\mu_{i j k}(x)}&&& \swarrow } \;\;\;\; = \;\;\;\; \array{ && \bullet \\ & \nearrow &\swArrow_{c_1 c_2 \mu_{i j k}(x)}& \searrow \\ \bullet &&\to&& \bullet }

in B 2U(1), which exhibits indeed the composition operation in P (Y,L,μ).

Examples

Equivariant bundle gerbes over the point

For AG^G a group extension by an abelian group G classified by a 2-cocycle c in group cohomology, which we may think of as a 2-functopr c:BGB 2A, the corresponding fiber sequence

AG^GBABG^BGcB 2AA \to \hat G \to G \to \mathbf{B}A \to \mathbf{B}\hat G \to \mathbf{B}G \stackrel{c}{\to} \mathbf{B}^2 A

exhibits BG^ as the bundle gerbe over BG (in equivariant cohomology of the point, if you wish) with Dixmier-Douady class c.

Tautological bunde gerbe

Let X be a simply connected smooth manifold and HΩ 3(X) cl,int a degree 3 differential form with integral periods.

We may think of this a cocycle in ∞-Lie algebroid cohomology

H:TXb 2.H : T X \to b^2 \mathbb{R} \,.

By a slight variant of Lie integration of oo-Lie algebroid cocycles we obtain from this a bundle gerbe on X by the following construction

  • pick any point x 0X;

  • let Y=P *X be the based smooth path space of X;

  • let LY× XY be the U(1)-bundle which over an element (γ 1,γ 2) in Y× XY – which is a loop in X assigns the U(1)-torsor whose elements are equivalence class of pairs (Σ,c), where Σ is a surface cobounding the loop and where cU(1), and where the equivalence relation is so that for any 3-ball ϕ:D 3X cobounding two such surfaces Σ 1 and Σ 2 we have that (Σ 1,c 1) is equivalent to (Σ 2,c 2) the difference of the labels differs by the integral of the 3-form

    c 2c 1 1= D 3ϕ *H/.c_2 c_1^{-1} = \int_{D^3} \phi^* H \in \mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z} \,.
  • the composition operation π 12 *Lπ 23 *Lπ 13 *L is loop-wise the evident operation that on loops removes from a figure-8 the inner bit and whch is group multiplication of the labels.

This produces a bundle gerbe whose class in H 3(X,) has [H] as its image in de Rham cohomology.

and

References

The notion of bundle gerbe as such was introduced in

A general picture of bundle n-gerbes (with connection) as circle (n+1)-bundles with connection classified by Deligne cohomology is in

  • Pawel Gajer, Geometry of Deligne cohomology Invent. Math., 127(1):155–207 (1997) (arXiv)

Revised on March 29, 2013 20:26:39 by Urs Schreiber (82.113.121.183)