nLab
(infinity,1)-category of (infinity,1)-sheaves

This entry is about the general properties and characterization of (∞,1)-categories of (∞,1)-sheaves – also known as ∞-stack (∞,1)-toposes.

The 1-categorical analog of the discussion is this entry is at category of sheaves.

Contents

Idea

For any (∞,1)-category C every (∞,1)-functor ()¯:CD which admits a fully faithful right adjoint – equivalently every (∞,1)-functor L:CC which is left adjoint to the inclusion LCC of its essential image LC into C – is a localization of an (∞,1)-category onto a reflective (∞,1)-subcategory characterized by the collection W of morphisms which it sends to equivalences?. One can think of it

  • as inverting these morphisms;

  • as projecting onto those objects of C which are local with respect to these morphsims: those objects which sees W as a collection of equivalences.

Using the familiar characterization of the category of sheaves in the 1-categorical context, this straightforwardly suggests to characterize (,1)-categories Sh(S) of (,1)-sheaves – also called (Grothendieck-Rezk-Lurie) (∞,1)-topoi as essential images of left exact? (,1)-functors from (∞,1)-categories of (∞,1)-presheaves

()¯:PSh(S)Sh(S)\bar{(-)} : PSh(S) \to Sh(S)

(called ∞-stackification, analogous to sheafification)

that have a fully faithful right adjoint forgetful functor

Sh(S)PSh(S).Sh(S) \hookrightarrow PSh(S) \,.

Definition

In the strict sense of the word, an (∞,1)-category of (,1)-sheaves is a topological localization of an (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-presheaves PSh (incfty,1)(C) on some small (∞,1)-category C

Sh (,1)(C)PSh (,1)(C).Sh_{(\infty,1)}(C) \hookrightarrow PSh_{(\infty,1)}(C) \,.

Notice that by the facts recalled there, every such topological localization corresponds uniquely, up to equivalence, to a choice of Grothendieck topology on C: the objects of Sh (,1)(C) are those (,1)-presheaves that satisfy descent with respect to Cech covers of covering sieves.

Often such (,1)-sheaves are called ∞-stacks. The counting is

Notice also that topological localizations are usually not hypercomplete (∞,1)-toposes. With slight abouse of language, the objects of the hypercompletion may still be called ”-stack”s around here.

Models

The topological localizations of an (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-presheaves are presented by the left Bousfield localization of the global model structure on simplicial presheaves at the set of Cech covers.

The hypercomplete (,1)-sheaf toposes are presented by the local Joyal-Jardine model structure on simplicial presheaves.

Detailed discussion of this model category presentation is at

References

The study of simplicial presheaves apparently goes back to

which considers locally Kan simplicial presheaves as a category of fibrant objects.

This was later conceived in terms of a model structure on simplicial presheaves and on simplicial sheaves by Joyal and Jardine. Toë summarizes the situation and emphasizes the interpretation in terms of ∞-stacks living in (,1)-categories for instance in

B. Toën, Higher and derived stacks: a global overview (arXiv) .

The full picture in terms of Grothendieck-(,1)-topoi of (,1)-sheaves is the topic of

J. Lurie, Higher Topos Theory.

  • localization (,1)-functors ((,1)-sheafification for the present purpose) are discussed in section 5.2.7;

  • local objects ((,1)-sheaves for the present purpose) and local isomorphisms are discussed in section 5.5.4;

  • the definition of (,1)-topoi of (,1)-sheaves is then definition 6.1.0.4 in section 6.1;

  • the characterization of (,1)-sheaves in terms of descent and codescent is in section 6.1.3

  • the relation between the Brown–Joyal–Jardine model and the general story is discussed at length in section 6.5.4