nLab
matching family

Contents

Idea

A matching family of elements is an explicit component-wise characterizaton of a morphism from a sieve into a general presheaf.

Since such morphisms govern the sheaf property and the operation of sheafification, these can be discussed in terms of matching families.

Definition

Let (C,τ) be a site and P:C opSet a presheaf on C. Let Sτ(c) be a covering sieve on object cC (in particular a subobject of the representable presheaf h c).

A matching family for S of elements in P is a rule assigning to each f:dc in S an element x f such that for all g:ed

P(g)(x f)=x fg.P(g)(x_f) = x_{f\circ g}.

Notice that fgS because S is a sieve, so that the condition makes sense; furthermore the order of composition and the contravariant nature of P agree. If we view the sieve S as a subobject of the representable h c, then a matching family (x f) fS is precisely a natural transformation x:SP, x:fx f.

An amalgamation of the matching family (x f) fS for S is an element xP(c) such that P(f)(x)=x f for all fS.

Properties

Characterization of sheaves

P is a sheaf for the Grothendieck topology τ iff for all c, for all Sτ(c) and every matching family (x) fS for S, there is a unique amalgamation. Equivalently P is a sheaf if any natural transformation x:SP has a unique extension to h CP (along inclusion Sh c); or to phrase it differently, P is a sheaf (resp. separated presheaf) iff the precomposition with the inclusion i S:Sh C is an isomorphism (resp. monomorphism) i S:Nat(h C,P)Nat(S,P).

Suppose now that C has all pullbacks. Let R=(f i:c ic) iI be any cover of c (i.e., the smallest sieve containing R is a covering sieve in τ) and let p ij:c i× cc jc i, q ij:c i× cc jc j be the two projections of the pullback of f j along f i. A matching family for R of elements in a presheaf P is by definition a family (x i) iI of elements x iP(c i), such that for all i,jI, P(p ij)(x i)=P(q ij)(x j).

Sheafification

Let Match(R,P) be the set of matching families for R of elements in P. Sieves over c form a filtered category, where partial ordering is by reverse inclusion (refinement of sieves). There is an endofunctor () +:PShv(C,τ)PShv(C,τ) given by

P +(c):=colim Rτ(C)Match(R,P)P^+(c) := \mathrm{colim}_{R\in\tau(C)} \mathrm{Match}(R,P)

In other words, elements in P +(c) are matching families (x f R) fR for all covering sieves modulo the equivalence given by agreement x f R=x f R, for all fR, where RRR is a common refinement of R and R. This is called the plus construction.

Endofunctor PP + extends to a presheaf on C by P +(g:dc):(x f) fR(x gh) hg *R where g *R={h:edeC,ghR} (recall that by the stability axiom of Grothendieck topologies, g *(d)τ(d) is a covering sieve over d).

The presheaf P + comes equipped with a canonical natural transformation η:PP + which to an element xP(c) assigns the equivalence class of the matching family (P(f)(x)) fOb(C/c) where the maximal sieve Ob(C/c) is the class of objects of the slice category C/c.

η is a monomorphism (resp. isomorphism) of presheaves iff the presheaf P is a separated presheaf (resp. sheaf); moreover any morphism PF of presheaves, where F is a sheaf, factors uniquely through η:PP +. For any presheaf P, P + is separated presheaf and if P is already separated then P + is a sheaf. In particular, for any presheaf P ++ is a sheaf. A fortiori, P +(η)η:PP ++ realizes sheafification.

References

A standard reference is

Revised on December 17, 2011 14:23:24 by Urs Schreiber (89.204.137.170)