nLab
model structure on an over category

Context

Model category theory

model category

Definitions

Morphisms

Universal constructions

Refinements

Producing new model structures

Presentation of (,1)-categories

Model structures

for -groupoids

for ∞-groupoids

for n-groupoids

for -groups

for -algebras

general

specific

for stable/spectrum objects

for (,1)-categories

for stable (,1)-categories

for (,1)-operads

for (n,r)-categories

for (,1)-sheaves / -stacks

Contents

Definition

Proposition

For C a model category and XC an object, the over category C/X as well as the undercategory X/C inherit themselves structures of model categories whose fibrations, cofibrations and weak equivalences are precisely the morphism that become fibrations, cofibrations and weak equivalences in C under the forgetful functor C/XC or X/CC.

Properties

Proposition

If C is

then so are C/X and X/C.

The proofs are in (OvMod).

Proposition

If C is a combinatorial model category, then so is C/X.

Proof

By basic properties of locally presentable categories they are stable under slicing. Hence with C locally presentable also C/X is, and by prop. 2 with C cofibrantly generated also C/X is.

Proposition

If C is a simplicial model category and XC is fibrant, then the overcategory C/X with the above slice model structure is a presentation of the over-(∞,1)-category C /X: we have an equivalence of (∞,1)-categories

(C/X) C /X.(C/X)^\circ \simeq C^\circ / X \,.
Proof

It is clear that we have an essentially surjective (∞,1)-functor C /X(C/X) . What has to be shown is that this is a full and faithful (∞,1)-functor in that it is an equivalence on all hom-∞-groupoids C /X(a,b)(C/X) (a,b).

To see this, notice that the hom-space in an over-(∞,1)-category C /X between objects a:AX and b:BX is given (as discussed there) by the (∞,1)-pullback

C /X(AaX,BbX) C (A,B) b * * a C (A,X)\array{ C^\circ/X(A \stackrel{a}{\to} X, B \stackrel{b}{\to} X) &\to& C^\circ(A,B) \\ \downarrow && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{b_*}} \\ {*} &\stackrel{a}{\to}& C^\circ(A,X) }

in ∞Grpd.

Let AC be a cofibrant representative and b:BX be a fibration representative in C (which always exists) of the objects of these names in C , respectively. In terms of these we have a cofibration

A a X\array{ \emptyset &&\hookrightarrow&& A \\ & \searrow && \swarrow_{\mathrlap{a}} \\ && X }

in C/X, exhibiting a as a cofibrant object of C/X; and a fibration

B b X b Id X\array{ B &&\stackrel{b}{\to}&& X \\ & {}_{\mathllap{b}}\searrow && \swarrow_{\mathrlap{Id}} \\ && X }

in C/X, exhibiting b as a fibrant object in C/X.

Moreover, the diagram in sSet given by

C/X(a,b) C(A,B) b * * a C(A,X)\array{ C/X(a, b) &\to& C(A,B) \\ \downarrow && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{b_*}} \\ {*} &\stackrel{a}{\to}& C(A,X) }

is

  1. a pullback diagram in sSet (by the definition of morphism in an ordinary overcategory);

  2. a homotopy pullback in the model structure on simplicial sets, because by the axioms on the sSet Quillen enriched model category C and the above (co)fibrancy assumptions, all objects are Kan complexes and the right vertical morphism is a Kan fibration.

  3. has in the top left the correct derived hom-space in C/X (since a is cofibrant and b fibrant).

This means that this correct hom-space C/X(a,b)(C/X) (a,b)sSet is indeed a model for C /X(a,b)Grpd.

References

  • Hirschhorn, Overcategories and undercategories of model categories (pdf)

Revised on February 6, 2013 18:05:27 by Urs Schreiber (82.113.106.234)