Every topological space can be decomposed into disjoint maximal connected subspaces, called its connected components. The underlying set of a topological space is the disjoint union of the underlying sets of its connected components, but the space itself is not necessarily the coproduct of its connected components in the category of spaces.
One often studies topological ideas first for connected spaces and then generalises to general spaces. This is especially true if one is studying such nice topological spaces that every space is a coproduct of connected components (such as for example locally connected spaces; see below).
preserves coproducts. It's actually enough to require that it preserves binary coproducts (a detailed proof in a more general setting is given at connected object); in that case, notice that we always have a map
Here are some equivalent ways to say that is connected in more elementary terms:
Many authors allow the empty space to be connected. You can get this concept from the elementary definitions above by changing ‘exactly one’ to ‘at most one’ and changing ‘if and only if’ to ‘if’. Categorially, this version of connectedness requires only that the maps
be surjections. However, many results come out more cleanly by disqualifying the empty space (much as one disqualifies when one defines the notion of prime number). See also the discussion at empty space and too simple to be simple.
The elementary definitions above have been carefully phrased to be correct in constructive mathematics. One may also see classically equivalent forms that are constructively weaker.
The image of a connected space under a continuous map is connected.
Wide pushouts of connected spaces are connected. (This would of course be false if the empty space were considered to be connected.) This follows from the hom-functor definition of connectedness, plus the fact that coproducts in commute with wide pullbacks. More memorably: connected colimits of connected spaces are connected.
The interval , as a subspace of , is connected. (This is the topological underpinning of the intermediate value theorem.)
If is a connected subspace and (i.e. if is between and its closure), then is connected.
The basic results above give a plethora of ways to construct connected spaces. More exotic examples are sometimes useful, especially for constructing counterexamples.
where is some chosen fixed irrational number. It is easy to see this space is Hausdorff (using the fact that is irrational). However, the closure of consists of points of with either or , in other words, the union of two infinitely long strips of width and slopes , . Clearly any two such closures intersect, and therefore the space is connected.
This example is due to Golomb. Topologize the set of natural numbers by taking a basis to consist of sets , where are relatively prime. The space is Hausdorff, but the intersection of the closures of two non-empty open sets is never empty, so this space is connected.
Every topological space admits an equivalence relation where means that and belong to some subspace which is connected. The equivalence class of an element is thus the union of all connected subspaces containing ; it follows readily from Result 2 that is itself connected. It is called the connected component of . It is closed, by Result 5. A space is connected if and only if it has exactly one connected component (or at most one, if you allow the empty space to be connected).
There is another equivalence relation where if for every continuous mapping to a discrete space . The equivalence class of may be alternatively described as the intersection of all clopens that contain . This is called the quasi-component of , denoted here as . It is easy to prove that
and that equality holds if is compact Hausdorff or is locally connected (see below), but also in other circumstances (such as the space of rational numbers as a topological subspace of the real line).
For an example where , take to be the following subspace of :
In this example, , but .
An entry point is given in the following remark/warning:
It is not generally true that a space is the coproduct (in ) of its connected components, nor of its quasi-components. For example, the connected components in Cantor space (with its topology as a product of 2-point discrete spaces) are just the singletons, but the coproduct of the singleton subspaces carries the discrete topology; another example with this feature is the set of rational numbers with its absolute-value topology (the one induced as a topological subspace of the real line).
A space is locally connected if every open set, as a topological space, is the coproduct (in ) of its connected components. Equivalently, a space is locally connected if every point has a neighborhood basis of connected open sets.
In a locally connected space, every connected component is clopen; in particular, connected components and quasi-components coincide. We warn that connected spaces need not be locally connected; for example, the topologist’s sine curve of Example 4 is connected but not locally connected.
Examples of locally connected spaces include topological manifolds.
Let be the full inclusion of locally connected spaces. The following result is straightforward but useful.
is a coreflective subcategory of , i.e., the inclusion has a right adjoint . For a given space, has the same underlying set as , topologized by letting connected components of open subspaces of generate a topology.
Being a coreflective category of a complete and cocomplete category, the category is also complete and cocomplete. Of course, limits and particularly infinite products in are not calculated as they are in ; rather one takes the limit in and then retopologizes it according to Theorem 1. (For finite products of locally connected spaces, we can just take the product in – the result will be again locally connected.)
Let be the underlying set functor, and let be the functors which assign to a set the same set equipped with the codiscrete and discrete topologies, respectively. Let be the functor which assigns to a locally connected space the set of its connected components.
There is a string of adjoints
and moreover, the functor preserves finite products.
The proof is largely straightforward; we point out that the continuity of the unit is immediate from a locally connected space’s being the coproduct of its connected components. As for preserving finite products, write locally connected spaces , as coproducts of connected spaces
then their product in coincides with their product in , and is
where each summand is connected by Result 3. From this it is immediate that preserves finite products.
A space is totally disconnected if its connected components are precisely the singletons of .
In other words, a space is totally disconnected if its coreflection into is discrete. Such spaces recur in the study of Stone spaces.
An important variation on the theme of connectedness is path-connectedness. If is a space, define the path component to be the subspace of all for which there exists a continuous map where , .
Observe that this is a reflexive coequalizer, as witnessed by the mutual right inverse .
(We can even topologize by taking the coequalizer in of
We say is path-connected if it has exactly one path component.
It follows easily from the basic results above that each path component is connected. However, it need not be closed (and therefore need not be the connected component of ); see the following example. The path components and connected components do coincide if is locally path-connected.
The topologist’s sine curve
provides a classic example where the path component of a point need not be closed. (Specifically, consider a point on the locus of .)
As a contrast to a path-connected space, a totally path-disconnected space is a space such that its set of path components is equal to the underlying set of the space. Equivalently, that there are no non-constant paths. This by far does not mean that the space is discrete!
As above, let be the functor which assigns to each space its set of path components .
The functor preserves arbitrary products.
Let be a family of spaces; we must show that the comparison map
is invertible. Injectivity: suppose are tuples that map to the same tuple of path-components ; we must show that and belong to the same path component. For each , both and belong to , so we may choose a path connecting to . Then connects to . (Note this uses the axiom of choice.) Surjectivity: for any tuple , the component is nonempty for each , so we may choose an element therein. Then maps to . Again this uses the axiom of choice.
An elegant proof of the previous proposition but for preservation of finite products is as follows: both and preserve products, and a reflexive coequalizer of product-preserving functors , being a sifted colimit, is also product-preserving.
The functor preserves arbitrary coproducts.
The functor preserves coproducts since is connected, and similarly for . The coequalizer of a pair of natural transformations between coproduct-preserving functors is also a coproduct-preserving functor.
A space in which the only connected subspaces are the singletons and the empty set is called totally disconnected space.
Examples of countable connected Hausdorff spaces were give in