nLab
subspace topology

Contents

Definition

Given a topological space X in the sense of Bourbaki (that is, a set X and a topology τ X) and a subset Y of X, a topology τ Y on Y is said to be the topology induced from τ X by the set inclusion YX if τ Y=τ X pw{Y}{UYUτ X}. In other words, τ Y is the smallest topology on Y such that the inclusion YX is continuous. The pair (Y,τ Y) is then said to be a topological subspace of (X,τ X). The induced topology is for that reason sometimes called the subspace topology on Y.

A subspace i:YX is closed if Y is closed as a subset of X (or if i is a closed map), and is open if Y is open as a subset of X (or if i is an open map).

A property of topological spaces is said to be hereditary if its satisfaction for a topological space X implies its satisfaction for all topological subspaces of X.

Properties

Proposition

Subspace inclusions are precisely the regular monomorphisms in Top.

For example, the equalizer of two maps f,g:XY in Top is computed as the equalizer at the underlying-set level, equipped with the subspace topology.

Lemma

The pushout in Top of any (closed/open) subspace i:AB along any continuous map f:AC is a (closed/open) subspace j:CD.

Proof

Since U=hom(1,):TopSet is faithful, we have that monos are reflected by U; also monos and pushouts are preserved by U since U has both a left adjoint and a right adjoint. In Set, the pushout of a mono along any map is a mono, so we conclude j is monic in Top. Furthermore, such a pushout diagram in Set is also a pullback, so that we have the Beck-Chevalley equality if *=g * j:P(C)P(B) (where i:P(A)P(B) is the direct image map between power sets, and f *:P(C)P(A) is the inverse image map).

To prove that j is a subspace, let UC be any open set. Then there exists open VB such that i *(V)=f *(U) because i is a subspace inclusion. If χ U:C2 and χ V:B2 are the maps to Sierpinski space that classify these open sets, then by the universal property of the pushout, there exists a unique continuous map χ W:D2 which extends the pair of maps χ U,χ V. It follows that j 1(W)=U, so that j is a subspace inclusion.

If moreover i is an open inclusion, then for any open UC we have that j *( j(U))=U (since j is monic) and (by Beck-Chevalley) g *( j(U))= i(f *(U)) is open in B. By the definition of the topology on D, it follows that j(U) is open, so that j is an open inclusion. The same proof, replacing the word “open” with the word “closed” throughout, shows that the pushout of a closed inclusion i is a closed inclusion j.

A similar (but even simpler) line of argument establishes the following result.

Lemma

Let κ be an ordinal, viewed as a preorder category, and let F:κTop be a functor that preserves directed colimits. Then if F(ij) is a (closed/open) subspace inclusion for each morphism ij of κ, then the canonical map F(0)colim iκF(i) is also a (closed/open) inclusion.

Variations

There is also a notion of a Grothendieck topology induced along a functor from a Grothendieck topology on another category (actually the input can be a somewhat more general coverage, then the topology induced along the identity functor will serve as a sort of a completion). (this will be explained later).

A topology may be induced by more than a function other than a subset inclusion, or indeed by a family of functions out of Y (not necessarily all with the same target). However, the term ‘induced topology’ is often (usually?) restricted to subspaces; the general concept is called a weak topology. (This construction can be done in any topological concrete category; in this generality it is often called an initial structure for a source.) The dual construction (involving functions to Y) is a strong topology (or final structure for a sink); an example is the quotient topology on a quotient space.

Revised on January 30, 2013 06:11:41 by Todd Trimble (67.81.93.16)