CW-complex, Hausdorff space, second-countable space, sober space
connected space, locally connected space, contractible space, locally contractible space
A CW-complex is a nice topological space which is or can be built up inductively, by a process of attaching $n$-dimensional disks $D^n$ along their boundary spheres $S^{n.1}$ for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$: a cell complex built from the basic topological cells $S^{n-1} \hookrightarrow D^n$.
Being, therefore, essentially combinatorial objects, CW complexes are the principal objects of interest in algebraic topology; in fact, most spaces of interest to algebraic topologists are homotopy equivalent to CW-complexes. Notably the geometric realization of every simplicial set, hence also of every groupoid, 2-groupoid, etc., is a CW complex.
Also, CW complexes are the cofibrant objects in the standard model structure on topological spaces. This means in particular that every (Hausdorff) topological space is weakly homotopy equivalent to a CW-complex (but need not be strongly homotopy equivalent to one). Since every topological space is a fibrant object in this model category structure, this means that the full subcategory of Top on the CW-complexes is a category of “homotopically very good representatives” of homotopy types. See at homotopy theory and homotopy hypothesis for more on this.
A CW-complex is a topological space $X$ equipped with a sequence of spaces and continuous maps
and a cocone making $X$ into its colimit (in Top, or else in the category of compactly generated spaces or one of many other nice categories of spaces) where each space $X_n$ (called the $n$-skeleton of $X$) is the result of attaching copies of the $n$-disk $D^n = \{x \in \mathbb{R}^n: ||x|| \leq 1\}$ along their boundaries $S^{n-1} = \partial D^n$ to $X_{n-1}$. Specifically, $X_{-1}$ is the empty space, and each $X_n$ is a pushout in Top of a diagram of the form
where $I$ is some index set, each $j_i: S_{i}^{n-1} \to D_{i}^n$ is the boundary inclusion of a copy of $D^n$, and $f_i: S_{i}^{n-1} \to X_{n-1}$ is a continuous map, often called an attaching map. The coprojections $X_{n-1} \to X_n$ of these pushouts give the arrows on which diagram (1) is based.
A relative CW-complex $(X, A)$ is defined as above, except $X_{-1} = A$ is allowed to be any space.
A finite CW-complex is one which admits a presentation in which there are only finitely many attaching maps, and similarly a countable CW-complex is one which admits a presentation with countably many attaching maps.
Formally this means that (relative) CW-complexes are (relative) cell complexes with respect to the generating cofibrations in the standard model structure on topological spaces.
Milnor has argued that the category of spaces which are homotopy equivalent to CW-complexes, also called m-cofibrant spaces, is a convenient category of spaces for algebraic topology.
A CW-complex is a locally contractible topological space.
For instance (Hatcher, prop. A.4).
Every CW complex is homotopy equivalent to (the realization of) a simplicial complex.
See Gray, Corollary 16.44 (p. 149) and Corollary 21.15 (p. 206).
Every CW complex is homotopy equivalent to a space that admits a good open cover.
If $Y$ has the homotopy type of a CW complex and $X$ is a finite CW complex, then the function space $Y^X$ with the compact-open topology has the homotopy type of a CW complex.
This is proven in Milnor.
For $X$ a CW complex, the inclusion $X' \hookrightarrow X$ of any subcomplex has an open neighbourhood in $X$ which is a deformation retract of $X'$. In particular such an inclusion is a good pair in the sense of relative homology.
For instance (Hatcher, prop. A.5).
We discuss aspects of the singular homology $H_n(-) \colon$ Top $\to$ Ab of CW-complexes. See also at cellular homology of CW-complexes.
Let $X$ be a CW-complex and write
for its filtered topological space-structure with $X_{n+1}$ the topological space obtained from $X_n$ by gluing on $(n+1)$-cells. For $n \in \mathbb{N}$ write $nCells \in Set$ for the set of $n$-cells of $X$.
The relative singular homology of the filtering degrees is
where $\mathbb{Z}[nCells]$ denotes the free abelian group on the set of $n$-cells.
The proof is spelled out at Relative singular homology - Of CW complexes.
With $k,n \in \mathbb{N}$ we have
In particular if $X$ is a CW-complex of finite dimension $dim X$ (the maximum degree of cells), then
Moreover, for $k \lt n$ the inclusion
is an isomorphism and for $k = n$ we have an isomorphism
This is mostly for instance in (Hatcher, lemma 2.34 b),c)).
By the long exact sequence in relative homology, discussed at Relative homology – long exact sequences, we have an exact sequence
Now by prop. 3 the leftmost and rightmost homology groups here vanish when $k \neq n$ and $k \neq n-1$ and hence exactness implies that
is an isomorphism for $k \neq n,n-1$. This implies the first claims by induction on $n$.
Finally for the last claim use that the above exact sequence gives
and hence that with the above the map $H_{n-1}(X_{n-1}) \to H_{n-1}(X)$ is surjective.
The geometric realization of any locally finite simplicial set is a CW-complex (Milnor 57).
any noncompact smooth manifold of dimension $n$ is homotopy equivalent to an $(n-1)$-dimensional CW-complex. (Napier-Ramachandran).
Basic textbook accounts include
Original articles include
See also
An inconclusive discussion here about what parts of the definition a CW complex should be properties and what parts should be structure.