higher geometry / derived geometry
geometric little (∞,1)-toposes
geometric big (∞,1)-toposes
function algebras on ∞-stacks?
derived smooth geometry
∞-Lie theory (higher geometry)
An orbifold is much like a smooth manifold but possibly with singularities of the form of fixed points of group-actions.
Where a smooth manifold is a space locally modeled on Cartesian spaces/Euclidean spaces $\mathbb{R}^n$, an orbifold is, more generally, a space that is locally modeled on smooth action groupoids (homotopy quotients) $\mathbb{R}^n\sslash G$ of a finite group $G$ acting on a Cartesian space.
graphics grabbed from Hyde-Ramsden-Robins 14
This turns out to be broadly captured (Moerdijk-Pronk 97, Moerdijk 02) by saying that an orbifold is a proper étale Lie groupoid. (Morita equivalent Lie groupoids correspond to the same orbifolds.)
The word orbifold was introduced in (Thurston 1992), while the original name was $V$-manifold (Satake), and was taken in a more restrictive sense, assuming that the actions of finite groups on the charts are always effective. Nowadays these are called effective orbifolds and those which are global quotients by a finite group are global quotient orbifolds.
There is also a notion of finite stabilizers in algebraic geometry. A singular variety is called an (algebraic) orbifold if it has only so-called orbifold singularities.
An orbifold is a stack presented by an orbifold groupoid.
One can consider a bicategory of proper étale Lie groupoids and the orbifolds will be the objects of certain bicategorical localization of this bicategory (a result of Moerdijk-Pronk 97).
Equivalently, every orbifold is globally a quotient of a smooth manifold by an action of finite-dimensional Lie group with finite stabilizers in each point. (eg (Adem-Leida-Ruan 2007), Corollary 1.24)
In (ALR 07, theorem 1.23) is asserted that every effective orbifold $X$ (paracompact, Hausdorff) is isomorphic to a global quotient orbifold, specifically to a global quotient of $O(n)$ (where $n$ is the dimension of $X$) acting on the frame bundle of $X$ (which is a manifold).
It has been noticed that the topological invariants of the underlying topological space of an orbifold as a topological space with an orbifold structure are not appropriate, but have to be corrected leading to orbifold Euler characteristics, orbifold cohomology etc. One of the constructions which is useful in this respect is the inertia orbifold (the inertia stack of the original orbifold) which gives rise to “twisted sectors” in Hilbert space of a quantum field theory on the orbifold, and also to twisted sectors in the appropriate cohomology spaces. A further generalization gives multitwisted sectors.
Some basic building blocks of orbifolds:
The quotient of a ball by a discrete subgroup of the special orthogonal group of rotations is an orbifold, and orbifolds may be obtained by cutting out balls from ordinary smooth manifolds and gluing in these orbifold quotients.
The moduli stack of elliptic curves over the complex numbers is an orbifold, being the homotopy quotient of the upper half plane by the special linear group acting by Möbius transformations.
For $\mathcal{G}$ any orbifold, then the mapping space $\mathcal{G}^{\Pi(S^1)} = \mathcal{G}^{B\mathbb{Z}}$ is again an orbifold, called the inertia orbifold.
lens spaces?
Orbifolds are in differential geometry what Deligne-Mumford stacks are in algebraic geometry. See also at geometric invariant theory and GIT-stable point.
If the finiteness condition is dropped one also speaks of orbispaces and generally of stacks.
Orbifolds may be regarded as a kind of stratified spaces.
See also
Orbifolds in string theory:
The original articles:
Ichiro Satake, On a generalisation of the notion of manifold, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 42 (1956), 359–363 (doi:10.1073/pnas.42.6.359)
Ichiro Satake, The Gauss–Bonnet theorem for $V$-manifolds, J. Math. Soc. Japan 9 (1957), 464–492 (euclid:1261153826)
William Thurston, Three-dimensional geometry and topology, preliminary draft, University of Minnesota, Minnesota, (1992)
which in completed and revised form is available as his book:
The Geometry and Topology of Three-Manifolds; (web)
in particular the orbifold discussion is in chapter 13
André Haefliger, Groupoides d’holonomie et classifiants, Astérisque no. 116 (1984), p. 70-97 (numdam:AST_1984__116__70_0/)
and specifically for orbifolds in complex geometry:
Walter Lewis Baily, On the quotient of an analytic manifold by a group of analytic homeomorphisms, PNAS 40 (9) 804-808 (1954) (doi:10.1073/pnas.40.9.804)
Walter Lewis Baily, The Decomposition Theorem for V-Manifolds, American Journal of Mathematics Vol. 78, No. 4 (Oct., 1956), pp. 862-888 (jstor:2372472)
For careful comparative review of the definitions in these original articles see IKZ 10.
Survey of basic orbifold theory:
Daryl Cooper, Craig Hodgson, Steve Kerckhoff, Three-dimensional Orbifolds and Cone-Manifolds, MSJ Memoirs Volume 5, 2000 (pdf, euclid:1389985812)
Ieke Moerdijk, Janez Mrčun, Section 2.4 of: Introduction to foliations and Lie groupoids, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 91, 2003. x+173 pp. ISBN: 0-521-83197-0 (doi:10.1017/CBO9780511615450)
Adam Kaye, Two-Dimensional Orbifolds, 2007 (pdf)
Michael Davis, Lectures on orbifolds and reflection groups, 2008 (pdf)
Joan Porti, An introduction to orbifolds, 2009 (pdf)
Andrew Snowden, Introduction to orbifolds, 2011 (pdf)
Alejandro Adem, Michele Klaus, Lectures on orbifolds and group cohomology (pdf, pdf)
Francisco C. Caramello Jr, Introduction to orbifolds (arXiv:1909.08699)
See also
Wikipedia, Orbifolds
(which is mainly tailored toward Thurston’s approach).
Textbook account:
Christian Lange, Orbifolds from a metric viewpoint (arXiv:1801.03472)
Renato G. Bettiol, Andrzej Derdzinski, Paolo Piccione, Teichmüller theory and collapse of flat manifolds, Annali di Matematica (2018) 197: 1247 (arXiv:1705.08431, doi:10.1007/s10231-017-0723-7)
S. T. Hyde, S. J. Ramsden and V. Robins, Unification and classification of two-dimensional crystalline patterns using orbifolds, Acta Cryst. (2014). A70, 319-337 (doi:10.1107/S205327331400549X)
Survey of applications in mathematical physics and notably in string theory:
Orbifolds often appear as moduli spaces in differential geometric setting:
The generalization of orbifolds to weighted branched manifolds is discussed in
On orbifolds, orbifold cohomology and specifically on Chen-Ruan cohomology and orbifold K-theory:
Discussion of orbifolds as Lie groupoids/differentiable stacks:
Ieke Moerdijk, Dorette Pronk, Orbifolds, sheaves and groupoids, K-theory 12 3-21 (1997) (pdf, doi:10.4171/LEM/56-3-4)
Ieke Moerdijk, Orbifolds as Groupoids: an Introduction, Alejandro Adem, Jack Morava, Yongbin Ruan (eds.) Orbifolds in Mathematics and Physics, Contemporary Math 310 , AMS (2002), 205–222 (arXiv:math.DG/0203100)
Eugene Lerman, Orbifolds as stacks?, Enseign. Math. (2), 56 3-4 (2010) (arXiv:0806.4160, doi:10.4171/LEM/56-3-4)
Review:
Analogous discussion for topological orbifolds as topological stacks:
Discussion of the corresponding perspective in algebraic geometry, via Deligne-Mumford stacks:
The mapping stacks of orbifolds are discussed in
W. Chen, On a notion of maps between orbifolds, I. Function spaces, Commun. Contemp. Math. 8 (2006), no. 5, 569–620.
David Roberts, Raymond Vozzo, The Smooth Hom-Stack of an Orbifold, In : Wood D., de Gier J., Praeger C., Tao T. (eds) 2016 MATRIX Annals. MATRIX Book Series, vol 1. Springer, Cham (2018) (arXiv:1610.05904, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-72299-3_3)
An expected relation of orbifolds to global equivariant homotopy theory is discussed in
Discussion of orbifolds regarded as naive local quotient diffeological spaces:
Patrick Iglesias-Zemmour, Yael Karshon, Moshe Zadka, Orbifolds as diffeologies, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 362 (2010), 2811-2831 (arXiv:math/0501093)
Jordan Watts, The Differential Structure of an Orbifold, Rocky Mountain Journal of Mathematics, Vol. 47, No. 1 (2017), pp. 289-327 (arXiv:1503.01740)
Orbifold cobordisms are discussed in
K. S. Druschel, Oriented Orbifold Cobordism, Pacific J. Math., 164(2) (1994), 299-319.
K. S. Druschel, The Cobordism of Oriented Three Dimensional Orbifolds, Pacific J. Math., bf 193(1) (2000), 45-55.
Andres Angel, Orbifold cobordism (pdf)
See also at orbifold cobordism.
In perturbative string theory, orbifolds as target spaces for a string sigma-model were first considered in
Lance Dixon, Jeff Harvey, Cumrun Vafa, Edward Witten, Strings on orbifolds, Nuclear Physics B Volume 261, 1985, Pages 678-686 (doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90593-0)
Lance Dixon, Jeff Harvey, Cumrun Vafa, Edward Witten, Strings on orbifolds (II), Nuclear Physics B Volume 274, Issue 2, 15 September 1986, Pages 285-314 (doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90287-7)
and then further developed notably in
Robbert Dijkgraaf, Cumrun Vafa, Erik Verlinde, Herman Verlinde, The operator algebra of orbifold models, Comm. Math. Phys. Volume 123, Number 3 (1989), 485-526 (euclid:1104178892)
Eric Zaslow, Topological orbifold models and quantum cohomology rings, Comm. Math. Phys. 156 (1993), no. 2, 301–331.
Discussion of blow-up of orbifold singularities in string theory:
In terms of vertex operator algebras:
For orbifolds in string theory also the references at
Review of orbifolds in the context of string KK-compactifications and intersecting D-brane models includes
D. Bailin, A. Love, Orbifold compactifications of string theory, Phys. Rept. 315 (1999) 285-408 (doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(98)00126-4, spire:504382)
Katrin Wendland, Orbifold Constructions of K3: A Link between Conformal Field Theory and Geometry, in Orbifolds in Mathematics and Physics (arXiv:hep-th/0112006)
Joel Giedt, Heterotic Orbifolds (arXiv:hep-ph/0204315)
Dieter Lüst, S. Reffert, E. Scheidegger, S. Stieberger, Resolved Toroidal Orbifolds and their Orientifolds, Adv.Theor.Math.Phys.12:67-183, 2008 (arXiv:hep-th/0609014)
Susanne Reffert, The Geometer’s Toolkit to String Compactifications, lectures at String and M theory approaches to particle physics and cosmology, 2007 (arXiv:0706.1310)
Luis Ibáñez, Angel Uranga, Chapter 8 of String Theory and Particle Physics – An Introduction to String Phenomenology, Cambridge University Press 2012 (doi:10.1017/CBO9781139018951)
Ralph Blumenhagen, Dieter Lüst, Stefan Theisen, Chapter 10.5 Toroidal orbifolds, of Basic Concepts of String Theory Part of the series Theoretical and Mathematical Physics pp 585-639 Springer 2013
and for orbifolds of G2-manifolds for M-theory on G2-manifolds
Frank Reidegeld, $G_2$-orbifolds from K3 surfaces with ADE-singularities (arXiv:1512.05114)
Frank Reidegeld, $G_2$-orbifolds with ADE-singularities (pdf)
For topological strings the path integral as a pull-push transform for target orbifolds – in analogy to what Gromov-Witten theory is for Deligne-Mumford stacks – has first been considered in
Weimin Chen, Yongbin Ruan, Orbifold Gromov-Witten Theory, in Orbifolds in Mathematics and Physics (Madison, WI, 2001), 25–85, Contemp. Math., 310, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2002 (arXiv:math/0103156) A review with further pointers is in
Dan Abramovich, Lectures on Gromov-Witten invariants of orbifolds (arXiv:math/0512372)
Last revised on July 13, 2020 at 07:30:24. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.