The stabilization of an (∞,1)-category with finite limits is the free stable (∞,1)-category on . This is also called the -category of spectrum objects of , because for the archetypical example where Top the stabilization is the category of spectra.
There is a canonical forgetful (∞,1)-functor that remembers of a spectrum object the underlying object of in degree 0. Under mild conditions, notably when is a presentable (∞,1)-category, this functor has a left adjoint that freely stabilizes any given object of .
Going back and forth this way, i.e. applying the corresponding (∞,1)-monad yields the assignment
that may be thought of as the stabilization of an object . Indeed, as the notation suggests, may be thought of as the result as goes to infinity of the operation that forms from first the -fold suspension object and then from that the -fold loop space object.
Let be an (∞,1)-category with finite limits and write for its -category of pointed objects, the undercategory of under the terminal object.
On there is the loop space object (infinity,1)-functor , that sends each object to the pullback of the point inclusion along itself. Recall that if a -category is stable, the loop object functor is an equivalence.
The stabilization of is the limit (in the (infinity,1)-category of (infinity,1)-categories) of the tower of applications of the loop space functor
This is proposition 8.14 in StabCat.
The canonical functor from to and then further, via the functor that forgets the basepoint, to is therefore denoted
Concretely, for any with finite limits, may be constructed as the category of spectrum objects of :
This is definition 8.1, 8.2 in StabCat
If is an -category with finite limits that is a presentable (∞,1)-category, then the functor has a left adjoint
Prop 15.4 (2) of StabCat.
stabilization is not in general functorial. It’s failure of being functorial, and approximations to it, are studied in Goodwillie calculus.
Section 1.4 of