category with duals (list of them)
dualizable object (what they have)
ribbon category, a.k.a. tortile category
monoidal dagger-category?
For and two abelian groups, their tensor product is a new abelian group which is such that a group homomorphism is equivalently a bilinear map out of and .
Let Ab be the collection of abelian groups, regarded as a multicategory whose multimorphisms are the multilinear maps .
The tensor product in this multicategory is the tensor product of abelian groups.
Equivalently this means explicitly:
For two abelian groups, their tensor product of abelian groups is the abelian group which is the quotient of the free group on the product (direct sum) by the relations
for all and .
In words: it is the group whose elements are presented by pairs of elements in and and such that the group operation for one argument fixed is that of the other group in the other argument.
The 0-ary relations and follow automatically; one needs them explicitly only if one generalises to abelian monoids.
By definition of the free construction and the quotient there is a canonical function of the underlying sets
On elements this sends to the equivalence class that it represents under the above equivalence relations.
The following relates the tensor product to bilinear functions. It is a definition or a proposition dependening on whether one takes the notion of bilinear function to be defined before or after that of tensor product of abelian groups.
A function of underlying sets is a bilinear function precisely if it factors by the morphism of 2 through a group homomorphism out of the tensor product:
Equipped with the tensor product of def. 2 Ab becomes a monoidal category.
The unit object in is the additive group of integers .
To see that is the unit object, consider for any abelian group the map
which sends for
Due to the quotient relation defining the tensor product, the element on the left is also equal to
This shows that is in fact an isomorphism.
Let be a monoid in . The fact that the multiplication
is bilinear means by the above that for all we have
and
This is precisely the distributivity law of the ring.
For positive we write for the cyclic group of order , as usual.
A proof is spelled out for instance as (Conrad, theorem 4.1).
An exposition is in
and, in the further generality of the tensor product of modules, in