nLab
synthetic homotopy theory

Contents

Context

Type theory

natural deduction metalanguage, practical foundations

  1. type formation rule
  2. term introduction rule
  3. term elimination rule
  4. computation rule

type theory (dependent, intensional, observational type theory, homotopy type theory)

syntax object language

computational trinitarianism =
propositions as types +programs as proofs +relation type theory/category theory

logiccategory theorytype theory
trueterminal object/(-2)-truncated objecth-level 0-type/unit type
falseinitial objectempty type
proposition(-1)-truncated objecth-proposition, mere proposition
proofgeneralized elementprogram
cut rulecomposition of classifying morphisms / pullback of display mapssubstitution
cut elimination for implicationcounit for hom-tensor adjunctionbeta reduction
introduction rule for implicationunit for hom-tensor adjunctioneta conversion
logical conjunctionproductproduct type
disjunctioncoproduct ((-1)-truncation of)sum type (bracket type of)
implicationinternal homfunction type
negationinternal hom into initial objectfunction type into empty type
universal quantificationdependent productdependent product type
existential quantificationdependent sum ((-1)-truncation of)dependent sum type (bracket type of)
equivalencepath space objectidentity type/path type
equivalence classquotientquotient type
inductioncolimitinductive type, W-type, M-type
higher inductionhigher colimithigher inductive type
coinductionlimitcoinductive type
completely presented setdiscrete object/0-truncated objecth-level 2-type/preset/h-set
setinternal 0-groupoidBishop set/setoid
universeobject classifiertype of types
modalityclosure operator, (idempotent) monadmodal type theory, monad (in computer science)
linear logic(symmetric, closed) monoidal categorylinear type theory/quantum computation
proof netstring diagramquantum circuit
(absence of) contraction rule(absence of) diagonalno-cloning theorem
synthetic mathematicsdomain specific embedded programming language

homotopy levels

semantics

Homotopy

homotopy theory, (∞,1)-category theory, homotopy type theory

flavors: stable, equivariant, rational, p-adic, proper, geometric, cohesive, directed

models: topological, simplicial, localic, …

see also algebraic topology

Introductions

Definitions

Paths and cylinders

Homotopy groups

Basic facts

Theorems

Homotopy type theory

Contents

Idea

Homotopy type theory provides a synthetic formalization of homotopy theory in its modern and most powerful incarnation in the guise of (∞,1)-toposes.

Just like plain dependent type theory is the internal logic of locally cartesian closed categories, so homotopy type theory is the internal logic of locally cartesian closed (∞,1)-categories, and homotopy type theory with univalent type universes is the internal logic of elementary (∞,1)-toposes. This means that homotopy type theory provides a “structural” foundation of the kind that William Lawvere had found in topos theory, but refined to homotopy theory in the refined guise of (∞,1)-topos theory.

Homotopy type theory natively knows about the formalization of simplicial homotopy theory and higher topos theory without the need to first formalize several textbooks worth of material starting from bare set theory. For instance, the formal proof of the Blakers-Massey theorem (FFLL) does not need to begin by first formalizing what a simplicial set is, what a Kan fibrancy condition is, what the infinite tower of homotopy groups is, what weak homotopy equivalences are, what homotopy pushouts are, how they reflect in long exact sequences of homotopy groups; because all this is native to homotopy type theory. Accordingly, the proof, on top of being a formal proof, is elegantly transparent and of actual practical interest. Moreover, since the formal HoTT proof generalizes the traditional statement to more general (∞,1)-toposes, it is actually a genuine new mathematical result of genuine interest in modern homotopy theory, to practicing mathematicians not concerned about foundations.

Cubical synthetic homotopy theory

In (Mörtberg-Pujet) the authors make the case for the use of cubical type theory over HoTT in synthetic homotopy theory since univalence and HITs are natively supported there, rather than axiomatically added as in HoTT. The path algebra in HoTT is made complicated by the fact that many equalities do not hold definitionally, even in the proof of simple results such as that the torus is equivalent to the product of two circles. The proof of this result is trivial in cubical type theory.

References

The above text of the Idea section follows Schreiber 14.

Many of the articles listed at mathematics presented in homotopy type theory count as synthetic homotopy theory.

The use of cubical type theory for synthetic homotopy theory is discussed in:

  • Anders Mörtberg, Loïc Pujet, Cubical synthetic homotopy theory, CPP 2020: Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGPLAN International Conference on Certified Programs and Proofs January 2020, pp. 158–171, doi:10.1145/3372885.3373825, (pdf)

Last revised on January 6, 2021 at 17:49:27. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.