# nLab solid topos

Contents

under construction

### Context

#### Cohesive Toposes

cohesive topos

cohesive (∞,1)-topos

cohesive homotopy type theory

## Structures in a cohesive $(\infty,1)$-topos

structures in a cohesive (∞,1)-topos

## Structures with infinitesimal cohesion

infinitesimal cohesion?

# Contents

## Idea

The concept of solid topos is meant to be a characterization of gros toposes which further refines that of elastic toposes and cohesive toposes. The idea is that we may consistently regard the objects of such toposes as generalized spaces for some flavor of geometry, and that the axioms on the topos determine aspects of the geometric nature of these generalized spaces, as follows:

$\phantom{A}$gros topos$\phantom{A}$$\phantom{A}$generalized spaces obey…$\phantom{A}$
$\phantom{A}$cohesion$\phantom{A}$principles of differential topology$\phantom{A}$
$\phantom{A}$elasticity$\phantom{A}$principles of differential geometry$\phantom{A}$
$\phantom{A}$solidity$\phantom{A}$$\phantom{A}$principles of supergeometry$\phantom{A}$

## Definition

###### Definition

(solid topos)

Let $\mathbf{H}_{bos}$ be an elastic topos (this Def.) over a cohesive topos $\mathbf{H}_{red}$ (this Def.). Then a solid topos or super-differentially cohesive topos over $\mathbf{H}_{bos}$ is a sheaf topos $\mathbf{H}$, which is

1. a cohesive topos over Set (this Def.),

2. an elastic topos over $\mathbf{H}_{red}$ (this Def.).

3. equipped with a quadruple of adjoint functors (this Def.) to $\mathbf{H}_{bos}$ of the form

$\mathbf{H}_{bos} \array{ \overset{\phantom{A} even \phantom{A} }{\longleftarrow} \\ \overset{\phantom{AA} \iota_{sup} \phantom{AA} }{\hookrightarrow} \\ \overset{\phantom{AA} \Pi_{sup} \phantom{AA} }{\longleftarrow} \\ \overset{\phantom{AA} Disc_{sup} \phantom{AA} }{\hookrightarrow} } \mathbf{H}$

hence with $\iota_{sup}$ and $Disc_{sup}$ being fully faithful functors.

###### Lemma

(progression of (co-)reflective subcategories of solid topos)

Let $\mathbf{H}$ be a solid topos (Def. ) over an elastic topos $\mathbf{H}_{red}$:

$Set \array{ \overset{\phantom{A} \Pi_{red} \phantom{A} }{\longleftarrow} \\ \overset{\phantom{A} Disc_{red} \phantom{A} }{\hookrightarrow} \\ \overset{\phantom{A} \Gamma_{red} \phantom{A} }{\longleftarrow} \\ \overset{\phantom{A} coDisc_{red} \phantom{A} }{\hookrightarrow} } \mathbf{H}_{red} \array{ \overset{\phantom{AA} \iota_{inf} \phantom{AA} }{\hookrightarrow} \\ \overset{\phantom{AA} \Pi_{inf} \phantom{AA} }{\longleftarrow} \\ \overset{\phantom{AA} Disc_{inf} \phantom{AA} }{\hookrightarrow} \\ \overset{\phantom{AA} \Gamma_{inf} \phantom{AA} }{\longleftarrow} \\ \phantom{A} \\ \phantom{A \atop A} } \mathbf{H}_{bos} \array{ \overset{\phantom{AA} even \phantom{AA} }{\longleftarrow} \\ \overset{\phantom{AA} \iota_{sup} \phantom{AA} }{\hookrightarrow} \\ \overset{\phantom{AA} \Pi_{sup} \phantom{AA} }{\longleftarrow} \\ \overset{\phantom{AA} Disc_{sup} \phantom{AA} }{\hookrightarrow} \\ \overset{\phantom{AA} \Gamma_{sup} \phantom{AA} }{\longleftarrow} \\ \phantom{A} \\ \phantom{A \atop A} \\ \phantom{A \atop A} } \mathbf{H}$

Then these adjoint functors arrange and decompose as shown in the following diagram:

Here the composite adjoint quadruple

$Set \array{ \overset{\Pi \simeq \Pi_{red}\Pi_{inf} \Pi_{sup} }{\longleftarrow} \\ \overset{Disc = Disc_{sup} Disc_{inf} Disc_{red}}{\hookrightarrow} \\ \overset{\Gamma = \Gamma_{sup} \Gamma_{inf} \Gamma_{red} }{\longleftarrow} \\ \overset{\phantom{AA} coDisc \phantom{AA} }{\hookrightarrow} } \mathbf{H}$

exhibits the cohesion of $\mathbf{H}$ over Set, and the composite adjoint quadruple

$\mathbf{H}_{red} \array{ \overset{\iota_{sup} \iota_{inf}}{\hookrightarrow} \\ \overset{\Pi_{inf} \Pi_{sup} }{\longleftarrow} \\ \overset{Disc_{inf} Disc_{red}}{\hookrightarrow} \\ \overset{ \Gamma_{sup} }{\longleftarrow} } \mathbf{H}$

exhibits the elasticity of $\mathbf{H}$ over $\mathbf{H}_{red}$.

###### Proof

As in the proof of this Prop., this is immediate by the essential uniqueness of adjoints (this Prop.) and of the global section-geometric morphism (this Example).

###### Definition

(adjoint modalities on solid topos)

Given a solid topos $\mathbf{H}$ over $\mathbf{H}_{bos}$ (Def. ), composition of the functors in Lemma yields, via this Prop., the following adjoint modalities (this Def.)

$\rightrightarrows \;\dashv\; \rightsquigarrow \;\dashv\; Rh \;\;\colon\;\; \mathbf{H} \array{ \overset{ \rightrightarrows \;\coloneqq\; \iota_{sup} \circ even }{\longleftarrow} \\ \overset{\rightsquigarrow \;\coloneqq\; \iota_{sup} \circ \Pi_{sup} }{\longrightarrow} \\ \overset{ Rh \;\coloneqq\; Disc_{sup} \circ \Pi_{sup} }{\longleftarrow} } \mathbf{H} \,.$

Since $\iota_{sup}$ and $Disc_{sup}$ are fully faithful functors by assumption, these are (co-)modal operators (this Def.) on the cohesive topos, by this Prop..

We pronounce these as follows:

$\phantom{A}$ fermionic modality $\phantom{A}$$\phantom{A}$ bosonic modality $\phantom{A}$$\phantom{A}$ rheonomy modality $\phantom{A}$
$\phantom{A}$ $\rightrightarrows \;\coloneqq\; \iota_{sup} \circ even$ $\phantom{A}$$\phantom{A}$ $\rightsquigarrow \;\coloneqq\; \iota_{sup} \circ \Pi_{sup}$ $\phantom{A}$$\phantom{A}$ $Rh \;\coloneqq\; Disc_{sup} \circ \Pi_{sup}$ $\phantom{A}$

and we refer to the corresponding modal objects (this Def.) as follows:

• a $\rightsquigarrow$-comodal object

$\overset{\rightsquigarrow}{X} \underoverset{\simeq}{\epsilon^\rightsquigarrow_X}{\longrightarrow} X$

is called a bosonic object;

• a $Rh$-modal object

$X \underoverset{\simeq}{ \eta^{Rh}_X}{\longrightarrow} Rh X$

is called a rheonomic object;

###### Proposition

(progression of adjoint modalities on solid topos)

Let $\mathbf{H}$ be a solid topos (Def. ) and consider the adjoint modalities which it inherits

1. for being a cohesive topos, from this Def.,

2. for being an elastic topos, from this Def.,

3. for being a solid topos, from Def. :

$\phantom{A}$ shape modality $\phantom{A}$$\phantom{A}$ flat modality $\phantom{A}$$\phantom{A}$ sharp modality $\phantom{A}$
$\phantom{A}$ $ʃ \;\coloneqq\; Disc \Pi$ $\phantom{A}$$\phantom{A}$ $\flat \;\coloneqq\; Disc \circ \Gamma$ $\phantom{A}$$\phantom{A}$ $\sharp \;\coloneqq\; coDisc \circ \Gamma$ $\phantom{A}$
$\phantom{A}$ reduction modality $\phantom{A}$$\phantom{A}$ infinitesimal shape modality $\phantom{A}$$\phantom{A}$ infinitesimal flat modality $\phantom{A}$
$\phantom{A}$ $\Re \;\coloneqq\; \iota_{sup} \iota_{inf} \circ \Pi_{inf}\Pi_{sup}$ $\phantom{A}$$\phantom{A}$ $\Im \;\coloneqq\; Disc_{sup} Disc_{inf} \circ \Pi_{inf} \Pi_{sup}$ $\phantom{A}$$\phantom{A}$ $\& \;\coloneqq\; Disc_{sup} Disc_{inf} \circ \Gamma_{inf}\Gamma_{sup}$ $\phantom{A}$
$\phantom{A}$ fermionic modality $\phantom{A}$$\phantom{A}$ bosonic modality $\phantom{A}$$\phantom{A}$ rheonomy modality $\phantom{A}$
$\phantom{A}$ $\rightrightarrows \;\coloneqq\; \iota_{sup} \circ even$ $\phantom{A}$$\phantom{A}$ $\rightsquigarrow \;\coloneqq\; \iota_{sup} \circ \Pi_{sup}$ $\phantom{A}$$\phantom{A}$ $Rh \;\coloneqq\; Disc_{sup} \circ \Pi_{sup}$ $\phantom{A}$

Then these arrange into the following progression, via the preorder on modalities from this Def.:

$\array{ id &\dashv& id \\ \vee && \vee \\ \rightrightarrows &\dashv& \rightsquigarrow &\dashv& Rh \\ && \vee && \vee \\ && \Re &\dashv& \Im &\dashv& \& \\ && && \vee && \vee \\ && && ʃ &\dashv& \flat &\dashv& \sharp \\ && && && \vee && \vee \\ && && && \emptyset &\dashv& \ast }$

where we are displaying, for completeness, also the adjoint modalities at the bottom $\emptyset \dashv \ast$ and the top $id \dashv id$ (this Example).

###### Proof

By this Prop., it just remains to show that for all objects $X \in \mathbf{H}$

1. $\Im X$ is an $Rh$-modal object, hence $Rh \Im X \simeq X$,

2. $\Re X$ is a bosonic object, hence $\overset{\rightsquigarrow}{\Re X} \simeq \Re X$.

The proof is directly analogous to the proof of that Prop., now using the decompositions from Lemma :

\begin{aligned} Rh \Im & = Disc_{sup} \underset{ \simeq id }{ \underbrace{ \Pi_{sup} \;\; Disc_{sup} } } Disc_{inf} \Pi_{inf} \Pi_{sup} \\ & \simeq Disc_{sup} Disc_{inf} \Pi_{inf} \Pi_{sup} \\ & = \Im \end{aligned}

and

\begin{aligned} \rightsquigarrow \Re & = \iota_{sup} \underset{\simeq id}{\underbrace{ \Pi_{sup} \;\; \iota_{sup}}} \iota_{inf} \Pi_{inf}\Pi_{sub} \\ & \simeq \iota_{sup} \iota_{inf} \Pi_{inf} \Pi_{sub} \\ & \simeq \Re \end{aligned}

## Examples

### Super formal smooth sets

The sheaf topos of super formal smooth sets is solid over that of formal smooth sets, which is elastic over that of smooth sets, which is cohesive over Set.

Last revised on July 31, 2018 at 07:31:52. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.