topology (point-set topology, point-free topology)
see also differential topology, algebraic topology, functional analysis and topological homotopy theory
Basic concepts
fiber space, space attachment
Extra stuff, structure, properties
Kolmogorov space, Hausdorff space, regular space, normal space
sequentially compact, countably compact, locally compact, sigma-compact, paracompact, countably paracompact, strongly compact
Examples
Basic statements
closed subspaces of compact Hausdorff spaces are equivalently compact subspaces
open subspaces of compact Hausdorff spaces are locally compact
compact spaces equivalently have converging subnet of every net
continuous metric space valued function on compact metric space is uniformly continuous
paracompact Hausdorff spaces equivalently admit subordinate partitions of unity
injective proper maps to locally compact spaces are equivalently the closed embeddings
locally compact and second-countable spaces are sigma-compact
Theorems
Analysis Theorems
In topology, some of the separation axioms that may be considered on topological spaces may equivalently be reformulated in terms of lifting properties (Gavrilovich 14).
A topological space comes with a specialisation preorder on its points: for points $x,y \in X$, $x \leq y$ iff $y \in cl x$ ($y$ is in the topological closure of $x$), or equivalently. The resulting preordered set may be regarded as a category whose objects are the points of ${X}$ and where there is a unique morphism $x{\searrow}y$ iff $y \in cl x$.
For a finite topological space $X$, the specialisation preorder or equivalently the corresponding category uniquely determines the space: a subset of ${X}$ is closed iff it is downward closed, or equivalently, there are no morphisms going outside the subset.
The monotone maps (i.e. functors) are the continuous maps for this topology.
We denote a finite topological space by a list of the arrows (morphisms) in the corresponding category; ‘$\leftrightarrow$’ denotes an isomorphism and ‘$=$’ denotes the identity morphism. An arrow between two such lists denotes a continuous map (a functor) which sends each point to the correspondingly labelled point, but possibly turning some morphisms into identity morphisms, thus gluing some points.
With this notation, we may display continuous functions for instance between the discrete space on two points, the Sierpinski space, the antidiscrete space and the point space as follows (where each point is understood to be mapped to the point of the same name in the next space):
In $A \longrightarrow B$, each object and each morphism in $A$ necessarily appears in {B} as well; we avoid listing the same object or morphism twice. Thus both
denote the same map from a single point to the discrete space with two points. Both
denote the morphism gluing points $U,x,V$.
In $\{a{\searrow}b\}$, the point $a$ is open and point ${b}$ is closed.
Fix two sets (subsets) $F$ and $G$ of $S$.
The sets $F$ and $G$ are disjoint if their intersection is empty:
In terms of arrows, the following map is well-defined: $S_{F,G}: S \longrightarrow \{F\leftrightarrow G \leftrightarrow \bullet \}$ such that $S_{F,G}(x)=F$ for $x \in F$, $S_{F,G}(x)=G$ for $x \in G$, and $S_{F,G}(x)=\bullet$ for $x \notin F\cup G$.
They are topologically disjoint if there exists a neighbourhood of one set that is disjoint from the other set:
In terms of arrows, $S_{F,G}: S \longrightarrow \{F\leftrightarrow \bullet \leftrightarrow G \}$ factors either as
or
where $U$, $V$ maps to $\bullet$. Notice that topologically disjoint sets must be disjoint.
They are separated if each set has a neighbourhood that is disjoint from the other set:
In terms of arrows, $S_{F,G}: S \longrightarrow \{F\leftrightarrow \bullet \leftrightarrow G \}$ factors both as
and as
where $U$, $V$ maps to $\bullet$. Notice that separated sets must be topologically disjoint.
They are separated by neighbourhoods if they have disjoint neighbourhoods:
The arrow $S_{F,G}: S \longrightarrow \{F\leftrightarrow \bullet \leftrightarrow G \}$ factors as $S \longrightarrow \{F \leftrightarrow U \searrow \bullet \swarrow V \leftrightarrow G\}\longrightarrow \{F \leftrightarrow U = \bullet = V \leftrightarrow G\}$ Notice that sets separated by neighbourhoods must be separated.
They are separated by closed neighbourhoods if they have disjoint closed neighbourhoods:
The arrow $S_{F,G}: S \longrightarrow \{F\leftrightarrow \bullet \leftrightarrow G \}$ factors as
Notice that sets separated by closed neighbourhoods must be separated by neighbourhoods.
They are separated by a function if there exists a continuous real-valued function on the space that maps $F$ to $0$ and $G$ to $1$:
The arrow $S_{F,G}: S \longrightarrow \{F\leftrightarrow \bullet \leftrightarrow G \}$ factors as
where points $0',0$ and $1,1'$ are topologically indistinguishable, and $0'$ maps to $F$, and $1'$ maps to $G$, and $[0,1]$ maps to $\bullet$. Notice that sets separated by a function must be separated by closed neighbourhoods (the preimages of $[-\epsilon, \epsilon]$ and $[1-\epsilon, 1+\epsilon]$).
Finally, they are precisely separated by a function if there exists a continuous real-valued function on the space that maps precisely $F$ to $0$ and $G$ to $1$:
The arrow $S_{F,G}: S \longrightarrow \{F\leftrightarrow \bullet \leftrightarrow G \}$ factors as
where $0'$ maps to $F$, and $1'$ maps to $G$, and $(0,1)$ maps to $\bullet$. Notice that sets separated by a function must be separated by closed neighbourhoods (the preimages of $[-\epsilon, \epsilon]$ and $[1-\epsilon, 1+\epsilon]$). Notice that sets precisely separated by a function must be separated by a function.
Often $F$ and $G$ will be points (identified with their singleton subsets); in that case, one usually says distinct in place of disjoint.
Often $F$ or $G$ will be closed sets; notice that disjoint closed sets are automatically separated, while a closed set and a point, if disjoint, are automatically topologically disjoint.
In all of the following definitions, ${X}$ is a topological space.
${X}$ is T0, or Kolmogorov, if any two distinct points in ${X}$ are topologically distinguishable. (It will be a common theme among the separation axioms to have one version of an axiom that requires T0 and one version that doesn’t.) As a formula, this is expressed as
${X}$ is R0, or symmetric, if any two topologically distinguishable points in $X$ are separated, i.e.
$X$ is T1, or accessible or Frechet, if any two distinct points in $X$ are separated, i.e.
Thus, $X$ is T1 if and only if it is both T0 and R0. (Although you may say such things as “T1 space”, “Frechet topology”, and “Suppose that the topological space $X$ is Frechet”, avoid saying “Frechet space” in this context, since there is another entirely different notion of Frechet space in functional analysis.)
$X$ is R1, or preregular, if any two topologically distinguishable points in X are separated by neighbourhoods. Every R1 space is also R0.
$X$ is weak Hausdorff, if the image of every continuous map from a compact Hausdorff space into $X$ is closed. All weak Hausdorff spaces are T1, and all Hausdorff spaces are weak Hausdorff.
$X$ is Hausdorff, or T2 or separated, if any two distinct points in $X$ are separated by neighbourhoods, i.e.
Thus, $X$ is Hausdorff if and only if it is both T0 and R1. Every Hausdorff space is also T1.
$X$ is $T2\frac{1}{2}$, or Urysohn, if any two distinct points in $X$ are separated by closed neighbourhoods, i.e.
Every $T2\frac{1}{2}$ space is also Hausdorff.
$X$ is completely Hausdorff, or completely T2, if any two distinct points in X are separated by a continuous function, i.e.
where $\{x,y\} \hookrightarrow X$ runs through all injective maps from the discrete two point space $\{x,y\}$.
Every completely Hausdorff space is also $T2\frac{1}{2}$.
$X$ is regular if, given any point ${x}$ and closed subset $F$ in $X$ such that ${x}$ does not belong to $F$, they are separated by neighbourhoods, i.e.
(In fact, in a regular space, any such ${x}$ and ${F}$ will also be separated by closed neighbourhoods.) Every regular space is also R1.
$X$ is regular Hausdorff, or T3, if it is both T0 and regular.[1] Every regular Hausdorff space is also $T2\frac{1}{2}$.
$X$ is completely regular if, given any point ${x}$ and closed set $F$ in $X$ such that ${x}$ does not belong to $F$, they are separated by a continuous function, i.e.
where points $F$ and $1$ are topologically indistinguishable, $[0,1]$ goes to $x$, and $F$ goes to $F$.
Every completely regular space is also regular.
$X$ is Tychonoff, or T3$\frac{1}{2}$, completely T3, or completely regular Hausdorff, if it is both T0 and completely regular.[2] Every Tychonoff space is both regular Hausdorff and completely Hausdorff.
$X$ is normal if any two disjoint closed subsets of $X$ are separated by neighbourhoods, i.e.
In fact, by Urysohn lemma a space is normal if and only if any two disjoint closed sets can be separated by a continuous function, i.e.
where points $0',0$ and $1,1'$ are topologically indistinguishable, $[0,1]$ goes to $x$, and both $0,0'$ map to point $0=0'$, and both $1,1'$ map to point $1=1'$.
$X$ is normal Hausdorff, or T4, if it is both T1 and normal. Every normal Hausdorff space is both Tychonoff and normal regular.
$X$ is completely normal if any two separated sets $A$ and $B$ are separated by neighbourhoods $U\supset A$ and $V\supset B$ such that $U$ and $V$ do not intersect, i.e.
Every completely normal space is also normal.
$X$ is perfectly normal if any two disjoint closed sets are precisely separated by a continuous function, i.e.
where $(0,1)$ goes to the open point $X$, and $0$ goes to $0$, and $1$ goes to $1$.
Every perfectly normal space is also completely normal.
Note that a standard proof of Uryhson lemma may be represented as follows: iterate the lifting property to prove
Then pass to the infinite limit to construct a map $X \longrightarrow \mathbb{R}$.
The Tietze extension theorem applies to normal spaces.
Accordingly, a (Hausdorff) space $X$ is normal if and only if every function $f \colon A \to \mathbb{R}$ from a closed subspace $A \subset X$ admits an extension $\tilde{f}: X \to \mathbb{R}$,
or what is the same, every regular monomorphism into $X$ in $Haus$ has the left lifting property with respect to the map $\mathbb{R} \to 1$.
Misha Gavrilovich, The unreasonable power of the lifting property in
elementary mathematics_ (pdf)
Misha Gavrilovich, Point set topology as diagram chasing computations (arXiv:1408.6710, pdf)
Last revised on December 31, 2019 at 04:12:44. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.