# nLab internal (co-)limit

Contents

### Context

#### Limits and colimits

limits and colimits

# Contents

## Idea

Speaking in the internal language of a given category $\mathbf{H}$, one may try to formulate universal constructions such as of limits/colimits internally.

Given the system of slice categories $\mathbf{H}_{/X}$ of $\mathbf{H}$ (or more generally any indexed category $X \mapsto \mathbf{H}_X$), then one may regard $X$ as the shape of a discrete internal diagram in $\mathbf{H}$, and regard the objects in the slice $\mathbf{H}_{/X}$ as discrete actual internal diagrams of this shape.

If $\mathbf{H}$ happens to have a (small) object classifier $\mathbf{h}$, then this is particularly evocative, as then (small) such slice objects $\hat F$ over $X$ equivalent to morphisms $F \colon X \to \mathbf{h}$, hence are directly analogous to external diagrams in the form of functors $\mathcal{X}\to \mathbf{H}$.

Now if $\mathbf{H}$ has good enough properties as a (self-)indexed category in that it is a hyperdoctrine with dependent sum $\underset{X \stackrel{f}{\to} Y}{\sum} \colon \mathbf{H}_{/X} \to \mathbf{H}_{/Y}$ and dependent product $\underset{X \stackrel{f}{\to} Y}{\prod} \colon \mathbf{H}_{/X} \to \mathbf{H}_{/Y}$ operations, then it makes sense to define the internal colimit of a discrete diagram as above as

$\underset{\longrightarrow}{\lim} F \coloneqq \underset{X}{\sum} \hat F$

and the internal limit as

$\underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim} F \coloneqq \underset{X}{\prod} \hat F \,.$

Of course with $X$ being, internally, a discrete diagram shape these are, so far, just internal coproducts and internal products, respectively (which is of course the source of the terminology “dependent sum” and “dependent product”).

It is more or less straightforward to extend the above from $\mathbf{H}$ to $Cat(\mathbf{H})$, the collection of internal categories in $\mathbf{H}$, then consider for a given internal category (hence internal diagram shape) $C \in Cat(\mathbf{H})$ the objects in $Cat(\mathbf{H})_{/C}$ as not-necessarily discrete diagrams, and proceed as before. For various specific choices of context $\mathbf{H}$, this is considered in (Johnstone, below prop. B2.3.20, Pisani 09, p.18, p. 23, HoTTBook, section 6.12).

To see internally the expected universal property of the above definition, consider the internal $X$-diagram constant on any $A \in \mathbf{H}$, namely $X^\ast A \in \mathbf{H}_{/X}$. If there is an object classifier $\mathbf{h}$ then this corresponds indeed to the constant map $X \to \ast \stackrel{\vdash A}{\to} \mathbf{h}$. Accordingly an internal cone with tip $A$ over the diagram $F$ as above is a morphism of $X$-diagrams (hence in $\mathbf{H}_{/X}$) of the fomr

$X^\ast A \longrightarrow \hat F \,.$

Now by the defining adjunction $(X^\ast \dashv \underset{X}{\prod})$ of the dependent product, such morphisms are equivalent to morphisms

$A \longrightarrow \underset{X}{\prod} \hat F$

in $\mathbf{H}$, hence by the above definition to morphisms

$A \longrightarrow \underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim} F$

from $A$ into the internal colimit.

This is clearly the internal version of the statement that is extrernally true Set, that the limit of sets over a diagram is the set of all its cones.

Dually, an internal cocone is a morphism

$\hat F \longrightarrow X^\ast A$

in $\mathbf{H}_{/X}$, and by the defining adjunction $(\underset{X}{\sum} \dashv X^\ast)$ of the dependent sum this is equivalently a morphism

$\underset{\longrightarrow}{\lim} F \longrightarrow A$

exhibiting internally the statement familiar externally from Set that maps out of colimits of a diagram are equivalently cocones under that diagram.

## Examples

### $\infty$-Groupoidal homotopy limits and colimits of $\infty$-groupoids

The small object classifier of the (∞,1)-topos ∞Grpd is $Core(\infty Grpd_{small})$ itself. Hence an $\infty$-groupoidal-shaped diagram of ∞-groupoids is internally in ∞Grpd a discrete diagram $F \colon X\to Core(\infty Grpd_{small})$. The slice object classified by this is the pullback of the universal right fibration, which is equivalently its (∞,1)-Grothendieck construction $\hat F = \int_X F$.

Accordingly the above gives the internal limits and colimits

$\underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim} F = \underset{X}{\sum} \hat F$

and

$\underset{\longrightarrow}{\lim} F = \underset{X}{\prod} \hat F \,.$

There are indeed also the correct external (∞,1)-colimits and (∞,1)-limits, by the discussion here.

### Borel construction and homotopy-quotients, -invariants, -coinvariants

For $\mathbf{H}$ an (∞,1)-topos and $G$ an ∞-group object, consider $X = \mathbf{B}G$ its delooping. Externally this is in general highly non-discrete, but internally this, being $\infty$-groupoidal, is a disrete diagram shape.

An internal diagram of this shape

$\rho \;\colon\; \mathbf{B}G \longrightarrow \mathbf{h}$

is equivalently an ∞-action of $G$ on the object $V$ named by

$\ast \to\mathbf{B}G \longrightarrow \mathbf{h} \,.$

Now the internal colimit

$\underset{\longrightarrow}{\lim} \rho = \underset{\mathbf{B}G}{\sum} \hat \rho \simeq V/\!/G$

is the homotopy quotient of $V$ by $G$, equivalently the object of homotopy coinvariants. In $\mathbf{H} =$ ∞Grpd this is given by the Borel construction.

Similarly, the internal limit

$\underset{\longleftarrow}{\lim} \rho = \underset{\mathbf{B}G}{\prod} \hat\rho \simeq Ext_G(\ast, V)$

is the homotopy invariants of the action.

More generally, the internal left and right Kan extension give the induced representation and coinduced representation constructions. See at ∞-action for more on this.

## References

Last revised on November 4, 2014 at 12:01:49. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.