homotopy theory, (∞,1)-category theory, homotopy type theory
flavors: stable, equivariant, rational, p-adic, proper, geometric, cohesive, directed…
models: topological, simplicial, localic, …
see also algebraic topology
Introductions
Definitions
Paths and cylinders
Homotopy groups
Basic facts
Theorems
Let $\sim$ be the relation of being homotopic (for example between morphisms in the category Top). Let $f:X\to Y$ and $g:Y\to X$ be two morphisms. We say that $g$ is a left homotopy inverse to $f$ or that $f$ is a right homotopy inverse to $g$ if $g\circ f\sim id_X$. A homotopy inverse of $f$ is a map which is simultaneously a left and a right homotopy inverse to $f$.
$f$ is said to be a homotopy equivalence if it has a left and a right homotopy inverse. In that case we can choose the left and right homotopy inverses of $f$ to be equal. To show this denote by $g_L$ the left and by $g_R$ the right homotopy inverse of $f$. Then
Hence
therefore $g_L$ is not only a left, but also a right, homotopy inverse to $f$.
This makes sense in any category equipped with an equivalence relation $\sim$, which is compatible with the composition (and with the equality of morphisms).
A functor which is an equivalence of categories is/has a homotopy inverse with respect to the notion of homotopy given by natural isomorphisms.
A weak homotopy equivalence of topological spaces between CW-complexes is a homotopy equivalence and hence has a homotopy inverse.
A weak homotopy equivalence of simplicial sets between Kan complexes is a homotopy equivalence and hence has a homotopy inverse.
Last revised on May 29, 2012 at 06:28:05. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.