higher geometry / derived geometry
Ingredients
Concepts
geometric little (∞,1)-toposes
geometric big (∞,1)-toposes
Constructions
Examples
derived smooth geometry
Theorems
The Erlangen program (in German, Erlanger Programm ) is a project, begun by Felix Klein at Erlangen in the 19th century (Klein 1872), to study geometry via symmetry groups of “geometric shapes”, hence from the perspective of group theory. The idea is to take the elementary building blocks of geometry to be not just Euclidean spaces but more generally homogeneous spaces $G/H$. These have then also been called Klein geometries .
In (Klein 1872, section 1) the theme of the program is described as follows:
Given a manifold and a transformation group acting on it, to investigate those properties of figures [Gebilde] on that manifold which are invariant under [all] transformations of that group.
In modern language this means to consider a group of homeomorphisms (diffeomorphisms) acting on a (smooth) manifold together with its stabilizer subgroup of any prescribed submanifold. (The concept of Lie group only emerged at that time, in fact Klein and Sophus Lie were in close contact, see Birkhoff-Bennett.)
The group of all such transformations
by which the geometric properties of configurations in space remain entirely unchanged
is called the “Hauptgruppe”, translated to “principal group”.
A few lines below in (Klein 1872, section 1) is the converse statement
Given a manifold, and a transformation group acting on it, to study its invariants.
Hence to find the figures which are left invariant by a given group action.
Then in (Klein 1872, end of section 5) it says:
Suppose in space some group or other, the principal group for instance, be given. Let us then select a single configuration, say a point, or a straight line, or even an ellipsoid, etc., and apply to it all the transformations of the principal group. We thus obtain an infinite manifoldness with a number of dimensions in general equal to the number of arbitrary parameters contained in the group, but reducing in special cases, namely, when the configuration originally selected has the property of being transformed into itself by an infinite number of the transformations of the group. Every manifoldness generated in this way may be called, with reference to the generating group, a body.
This means in modern language, that if $G$ is the given group acting on a given space $X$, and if $S \hookrightarrow X$ is a given subspace (a configuration), then the “body” (“Körper”) generated by this is the coset
of $G$ by the stabilizer subgroup of that configuration. In the case that $S$ is a point we would now call this the orbit of $S$. See also there at Stabilizer of shapes – Klein geometry.
The text goes on to argue that spaces of this form $G/Stab_G(S)$ are of fundamental importance:
If now we desire to base our investigations upon the group, selecting at the same time certain definite configurations as space-elements, and if we wish to represent uniformly things which are of like characteristics, we must evidently choose our space-elements in such a way that their manifoldness either is itself a body or can be decomposed into bodies.
Following this, such coset spaces $G/H$ have come to also be called Klein geometries.
When it was proposed, the Erlangen program served to unify various different kinds of geometry, discovered and studied at that time, into a common framwork. On the other hand, many kinds of geometries without global symmetries are not Klein geometries, notably Riemannian geometry is (in general) not. But a (pseudo) Riemannian manifold is locally (tangentially) modeled on Euclidean space (Minkowski spacetime) and this local model space is a Klein geometry. The generalization of Klein geometry to such local situations is Cartan geometry, see below.
In homotopy type theory the idea of a group of symmetries preserving a figure inside the larger group of symmetries acting on what the figure is inscribed in is represented by any map of the form:
The homotopy fiber of such a map is the Klein space $G/H$.
While many types of geometries (such as Riemannian geometry) are not in general Klein geometries, they are locally like Klein geometries. This generalization of Klein geometry is known as Cartan geometry.
local model | global geometry |
---|---|
Klein geometry | Cartan geometry |
Klein 2-geometry | Cartan 2-geometry |
higher Klein geometry | higher Cartan geometry |
In physics terminology this corresponds to “locally gauging” the symmetry group. For instance for $H \hookrightarrow G$ the inclusion of the Lorentz group into the Poincare group, then the corresponding Klein geometry is just Minkowski spacetime, but a corresponding Cartan geometry is any pseudo-Riemannian manifold, i.e. a spacetime characterized in the first-order formulation of gravity.
Aspects of Klein geometry may be generalized from groups to groupoids and even categories or $\infty$-groupoids. See at higher Klein geometry.
Logicians have attempted to demonstrate that specifically logical constructions are those invariant under the largest group of transformations, in the sense of the Erlangen program. See logicality and invariance.
The original article:
Felix Klein, Vergleichende Betrachtungen über neuere geometrische Forschungen (1872) Mathematische Annalen volume 43, pages 63–100 1893 (doi:10.1007/BF01446615)
English translation by M. W. Haskell:
A comparative review of recent researches in geometry, Bull. New York Math. Soc. 2, (1892-1893), 215-249. (euclid:1183407629, LaTeX version retyped by Nitin C. Rughoonauth: arXiv:0807.3161)
Historical context and related material:
Garrett Birkhoff, M. K. Bennett, Felix Klein and His “Erlanger Program”, in Aspray & Kitcher (eds.), History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics, University of Minnesota Press (1988) 145-176 $[$jstor:10.5749/j.cttttp0k.9, pdf, BirkhoffBennett-KleinAndErlangerProgram.pdf_file$]$
Jeremy Gray, Felix Klein’s Erlangen programme, in I. Grattan-Guinness (ed.), Landmark Writings in Western Mathematics 1640-1940, Elsevier (2005) 544-552 $[$doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-50871-3.X5080-3$]$
Vladimir Kisil, Erlangen Programme at Large: An Overview (arXiv:1106.1686)
Hermann Weyl, Symmetry, Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 28 6 (1938) 253-271 $[$jstor:24530200$]$
Ernst Cassirer, The concept of Group and The Theory of Perception, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5 1 (1944) 1-36 $[$doi:10.2307/2102891$]$
Branko Grünbaum, G. C. Shephard: A hierarchy of classification methods for patterns, Zeitschrift für Kristallographie - Crystalline Materials, 154 (2010) 163-187 $[$doi:10.1524/zkri.1981.154.14.165, sci-hub:10.1524/zkri.1981.154.3-4.163$]$
Last revised on June 14, 2022 at 12:05:44. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.