nLab
vertical transformation

Contents

Idea

A vertical transformation is an analogue of a natural transformation which goes between double functors of double categories, and whose components are vertical arrows and squares. There is a dual notion of horizontal transformation.

Definition

If C and D are strict double categories regarded as internal categories in Cat and F,G:CD are double functors regarded as internal functors in Cat, then a transformation between them is simply an internal natural transformation in Cat. Whether this is a vertical or horizontal transformation depends on how we identify double categories with internal categories in Cat (there being two ways).

More explicitly, a vertical transformation α:FG consists of

  • For every object cC, a vertical arrow

    Fc α c Gc\array{ F c \\ \downarrow ^{\alpha_c} \\ G c}

    in D, which are natural with respect to vertical composition of vertical arrows in C.

  • For every horizontal arrow p:c 1c 2 in C, a square

    Fc 1 Fp Fc 2 α c 1 α p α c 2 Gc 1 Gp Gc 2\array{F c_1 & \overset{F p}{\to} & F c_2\\ ^{\alpha_{c_1}}\downarrow & \Downarrow^{\alpha_p}& \downarrow^{\alpha_{c_2}}\\ G c_1& \underset{G p}{\to} & G c_2}

    in D, which are natural with respect to vertical composition of squares in C.

  • For each cC, if 1 c:cc is its horizontal identity, then the square α 1 c is equal to 1 α c, the identity square on the arrow α c.

  • For p:c 1c 2 and q:c 2c 3, the horizontal composite of α p and α q is equal to α qp.

The notion of horizontal transformation is dual.

The double category of double functors

Another characterization of transformations between double categories comes from observing that the 1-category DblCat is cartesian closed, and so any two double categories have an exponential D C. The objects of D C are double functors, its vertical arrows are vertical transformations, and its horizontal arrows are horizontal transformations. Its squares are a sort of “square modification” relating a pair of vertical and a pair of horizontal transformations.

Generalizations

It is easy to modify the explicit definition to handle the cases when C and D are weak in one direction or the other, and/or when F and G are pseudo functors in one direction or the other, by composing with appropriate coherence constraints. In this way, we obtain many 2-categories of double categories.

It is also easy to define vertical transformations between double functors which are horizontally lax or colax, and dually. In fact, given double categories C,D,C,D, lax functors F:CD and F:CD, and colax functors G:CC and G:DD, we can define a vertical transformation having the shape

C F D G G C F D\array{C & \overset{F}{\to} & D \\ ^G\downarrow & \Downarrow& \downarrow^{G'}\\ C'& \underset{F'}{\to} & D'}

despite the fact that the composites GFand FG do not exist as double functors of any sort. Such transformations are the squares of a large double category Dbl whose objects are double categories, whose horizontal arrows are lax functors, and whose vertical arrows are colax functors. This, in turn, is a special case of a construction which works for algebras over any 2-monad.

Finally, we can also define vertical transformations between functors of (horizontally) virtual double categories.

Revised on April 7, 2010 23:09:10 by Mike Shulman (205.208.124.120)