equivalences in/of -categories
We give the definition in terms of the model of (∞,1)-categories in terms of quasi-categories.
Recall from join of quasi-categories that there are two different but quasi-catgorically equivalent definitions of join, denoted and . Accordingly we have the following two different but quasi-categoricaly equivalent definitions of over/under quasi-categories.
Let be a quasi-category. let be any simplicial set and let
be an (∞,1)-functor – a morphism of simplicial sets.
The under-quasi-category is the simplicial set characterized by the property that for any other simplicial set there is a natural bijection of hom-sets
where is the canonical inclusion of into its join of simplicial sets with .
Similarly, the over quasi-category over is the simplicial set characterized by the property that
naturally in , where is the canonical inclusion map .
The functor
with denoting the other definition of join of quasi-categories (as described there)
has a right adjoint
and its image is another definition of the quasi-category under .
The first definition in terms of the the mapping property is due to Andre Joyal. Together with the discussion of the concrete realization it appears as HTT, prop 1.2.9.2. The second definition appears in HTT above prop. 4.2.1.5.
The simplicial sets and are indeed themselves again quasi-categories.
This appears as HTT, prop. 1.2.9.3
The two definitions yield equivalent results in that the canonical morphism
is an equivalence of quasi-categories.
This is HTT, prop. 4.2.1.5
From the formula
we see that
an object in the over quasi-category is a cone over ;.
For instance if then an object in is a 2-cell
in .
a morphism in is a morphism of cones,
etc:.
So we may think of the overcategory as the quasi-category of cones over . Accordingly we have that
the terminal object in is (if it exists) the limit in over ;
the initial object in is (if it exists) the colimit of in .
For (the nerve of) an ordinary category and , this construction coincides with the ordinary notion of overcategory in that there is a canonical isomorphism of simplicial sets
This appears as HTT, remark 1.2.9.6.
If is a categorical equivalence then so is the induced morphism .
This appears as HTT, prop 1.2.9.3.
For an (∞,1)-category and an object in and and two objects in , the hom-∞-groupoid is equivalent to the homotopy fiber of over the morphism : we have an (∞,1)-pullback diagram
This is HTT, prop. 5.5.5.12.
over-(∞,1)-category
Section 1.2.9 of