As you can see from finite set, there are at least five definitions of that term, which are all equivalent given the axiom of choice. The negation of any of these gives a definition of infinite set.

A set $S$ is infinite if, given any natural number$n$ and a finite sequence$(x_1, \ldots, x_n)$ of elements of $S$, there exists an element $y$ of $S$ such that $y = x_i$ is always false.

In other words, given any function$f$ from a Kuratowski-finite set to $S$, there exists an element of $S$ that is not in the image of $f$. This is essentially a variation of Richard Dedekind's definition of a Dedekind-infinite set.

Note that you can make this definition work without previously assuming the existence of natural numbers, by using an infinity-free definition of Kuratowski-finite set.

Remarks

Probably a lot to say about the relation between the various definitions of infinite set (the one above, the negations of the definitions of finite set, and others that might be studied). In the meantime, try the English Wikipedia.

Revised on January 16, 2011 03:15:13
by Toby Bartels
(75.117.106.4)