# nLab finite (infinity,1)-limit

### Context

#### $(\infty,1)$-Category theory

(∞,1)-category theory

## Models

#### Limits and colimits

limits and colimits

# Finite $(\infty,1)$-limits

## Definition

A finite $(\infty,1)$-limit is an (∞,1)-limit over a finitely presented (∞,1)-category – a finite (∞,1)-category.

If we model our (∞,1)-categories by quasicategories, then this can be made precise by saying it is a limit over some simplicial set with finitely many nondegenerate simplices. Note that such a simplicial set is rarely itself a quasicategory; we regard it instead as a finite presentation of a quasicategory.

## Properties

### Preservation of finite $(\infty,1)$-limits

###### Proposition

An (∞,1)-functor $F : C \to D$ out of an (∞,1)-category $C$ that has all finite $(\infty,1)$-limits preserves these finite $(\infty,1)$-limits as soon as it preserves (∞,1)-pullbacks and the terminal object.

This appears as (Lurie, cor. 4.4.2.5).

###### Proposition

Let $C$ be a small (∞,1)-category with finite $(\infty,1)$-limits, and $\mathbf{H}$ an (∞,1)-topos. Write $PSh(C)$ for the (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-presheaves on $C$.

If a functor $F : PSh_\infty(C) \to \mathbf{H}$ preserves (∞,1)-colimits and finite $(\infty,1)$-limits of representables, then it preserves all finite $(\infty,1)$-limits.

This appears as (Lurie, prop. 6.1.5.2).

## Examples

• Binary products, pullbacks, and terminal objects are all finite $(\infty,1)$-limits.

• Unlike the case in 1-category theory, the splitting of idempotents is not a finite $(\infty,1)$-limit.

## References

Revised on June 19, 2013 12:25:41 by Urs Schreiber (82.169.65.155)