The aim of this entry is to describe some of the classical versions of important concepts which are needed elsewhere. This may serve as an entry point for someone versed in a more classical version of algebraic topology, or being adept at the nPOV, and its ramifications, needs to bridge the gap to more classical ideas to understand some more classically written source. (It may also be useful if some classically written source is not at hand when you need it!) The exposition will be fairly ‘classical’ with asides to explain the significance for later developments and for connections to the nPOV.
A classical triangulation of is a pair , where is a simplicial complex and is a homeomorphism.
(In this context we will often drop the term ‘classical’ referring to ‘triangulation’ if there is little risk of confusion.)
The older form of subdivision involved the geometric realisation in the following way:
If is a simplicial complex, a (classical) subdivision of is a simplicial complex, , such that
a) the vertices of are (identified with) points of ;
b) if is a simplex of there is a simplex, of such that ; and
c) the mapping from to , that extends the mapping of vertices of to the corresponding points of , is a homeomorphism.
The interpretation, in simplicial complex, of the points of as convex combinations of the vertices, allows an interpretation to be ascribed to . The general question of the meaning of ‘refinements’ that will be examined later may need a deeper examination of this subdivision process as it is a simple case of such a refinement.
Any subdivision of a subdivision of is a subdivision of .
If and are subdivisions of then there is a subdivision of that is a subdivision of both and .
These statements thus assert that the subdivisions of a simplicial complex form a directed set with respect to the partial ordering defined by the relation of subdivision. (We will return to this later in this entry.)
Given any simplex, (or put more pedantically ), and using the Canonical Construction of , we can assign an open simplex, , to . We first recall, from simplicial complex, that is constructed as follows:
is the set of all functions from to the closed interval such that
is a simplex of ;
(We then give this set a topology (see simplicial complex).)
For , the open simplex, is defined by
Beware although a closed simplex will be a closed subset of , an open simplex need not be open in . However every is and open set of . (see Spanier, p. 112, for a discussion.)
The barycentric subdivision is one of the best known and most useful natural subdivisions available in general. (Other are also used, for instance, the middle edge or ordinal subdivision?.) The barycentric subdivision has the good property that it exists without recourse to the realisation process, although usually introduced via that process. It is in that form that it is discussed in subdivision. Here we give the ‘classical’ form and go from that towards the other functorial form.
If , the set of -simplices of a simplicial complex, , then its barycentre, , is the point
The barycentric subdivision, , of is the simplicial complex whose vertices are the barycentres of the simplices of and whose simplices are finite non-empty collections of barycentres of simplices, which are totally ordered by the face relation of , i.e., by inclusion when considered as subsets of .
As is completely determined by , this can be rephrased as:
The barycentric subdivision, , of is the simplicial complex specified by
We now need a bit more terminology:
Given any vertex of , its star is defined by
The set, , is open in . We have
the union of the interiors of those simplices that have as a vertex. These vertex stars give an open cover, , of and the following classical result tells us that the nerve of this covering is itself (up to isomorphism):
Let . The vertex map from to defined by
is a simplicial isomorphism