For a sufficiently nice topological space, the fundamental group at a point can be reconstructed as a group of deck transformations of the universal covering space, which is the same as the automorphisms of the fiber over that point of the projection map. The deck transformations are monodromies induced by loops at the base point;. The functor which assigns to a point the fiber functor over it, generalizes to fiber functors in Tannakian formalism of Grothendieck which defines in more general setups the fundamental groupoid as the group of automorphisms of the appropriate fiber functor. See also fundamental group of a topos.
The objects on the left are not difficult to define for schemes (at least naively – one really needs trivialisations over étale covers), but it may not be entirely immediate what the fundamental group defined in terms of loops should be.
The reason Galois’s name is attached to this theory is that in the case of the scheme , the objects corresponding to the covering spaces are simply field extensions . The fundamental group of schemes defined in this way is the algebraic fundamental group, and is a profinite group.
The basic idea of Grothendieck’s Galois theory may be extended to objects in an topos – leading to a notion of fundamental group of a topos – and then further to objects in any (∞,1)-topos. For more on this see homotopy group of an ∞-stack.
It is not obvious, but a strict epimorphism is an epimorphism.
J. P. Murre, Lectures on an introduction to Grothendieck’s theory of the fundamental group, Tata Inst. of Fund. Res. Lectures on Mathematics 40, Bombay, 1967. iv+176+iv pp.
and copied also in
G0) The full subcategory of on the finite objects is cofinal.
G1) has all finite limits
G3) Given in there is a factorisation where is a strict epimorphism and is a mono. Also, is assumed to be a direct summand of .
G4) preserves finite limits
G5) preserves initial object, finite sums, quotients by finite group actions and sends strict epimorphisms to surjections
G6) reflects isomorphisms
The functor is called the fibre functor, and the pair is sometimes called a Galois category.
It follows from the axioms that is a pro-representable functor. The automorphism group of the pro-object representing is (should be. I’m not familiar enough with pro-objects) a profinite group . This acts on by precomposition (talking out of my depth here – it’s getting a bit vague) and so lifts to a functor to , and Grothendieck’s result is that this functor is an equivalence of categories.
There are several modifications one can make the above. In the case that is the category of covering spaces of a nice enough space, the functor is representable by the universal covering space, and so there is a ‘representable’ version of the above, not needing to utilise profinite groups. One can also consider just the connected-objects version, and end up with an equivalence to the category of transitive -sets.
Even for the classical case of the inclusion of fields, Grothendieck’s Galois theorem gives more general statement than the previously known. This is the Grothendieck’s version of the Galois correspondence theorem for fields:
Let be a finite dimensional Galois extension of fields. Let denote the group of -automorphisms of and the category of finite -sets. By denote the finite dimensional -algebras which are split over ; here itself is an object. Consider the representable functor . It takes values in the subcategory of finite sets and it comes with a canonical -action. In other words, this functor factors through . Moreover, the corresponding functor
SplitfinAlg_K(L)\to Gal [L : K]-finSet
is an equivalence of categories.
There is an infinitary version as well, generalizing the classical Galois theorem on infinitary Galois extensions.
Thus let be an arbitrary Galois extension. Now denotes the profinite Galois group and the category or profinite -spaces. denotes the category of -algebras split over (possible infinite-dimensional). Then there is a canonical anti-equivalence of categories
SplitAlg_K(L)\to Gal [L : K]-profinSpace
(factorizing a profinite-space version of the representable functor ).
A special case of this is the following: the category of étale k-schemes reps. étale group schemes? for a field is equivalent to the category of sets equipped with an action of the absolute Galois group reps. to the category of Galois modules of the absolute Galois group.
Let be a Grothendieck topos. Then there exist an open localic groupoid such that is equivalent to the category of étale presheaves over . One of the classical references is
This is a variant of the theorem in the setting of locales from
A more recent treatment can be found in
and a very approachable account given in
(This has the advantage of looking towards Grothendieck’s dessins d’enfants.)
Basic intuition is explained in
The construction for general toposes is described in section 8.4 of
and, a current state of the art description is in
A modern approach from classical via Grothendieck up to categorical Galois theory based on precategories and adjunctions is in
The application of a general Tannakian theorem of Saavaedra Rivano, as corrected by Deligne, to the “differential Galois theory” for differential instead of algebraic equations is in the last chapter of Deligne’s Catégories Tannakiennes.