nLab
Ehresmann connection

Context

-Chern-Weil theory

-Lie theory

∞-Lie theory

Background

Smooth structure

Higher groupoids

Lie theory

∞-Lie groupoids

∞-Lie algebroids

Formal Lie groupoids

Cohomology

Homotopy

Examples

-Lie groupoids

-Lie groups

-Lie algebroids

-Lie algebras

Contents

Idea

The notion of Ehresmann connection is one of the various equivalent definitions of connection on a bundle.

Definition

In terms of differential forms

Let G be a Lie group with Lie algebra 𝔤 and PX a G-principal bundle. Let

ρ:P×GP\rho : P \times G \to P

be the action of G on P and

ρ *:𝔤Γ(TX)\rho_* : \mathfrak{g} \to \Gamma(T X)

its derivative, sending each element x𝔤 to the vector field on P that at pP is the push-forward ρ(p,) *(x).

For vΓ(TX) and ω a differential form on P write ι vω for the contraction.

Definition

A Cartan-Ehresmann connection on P is a Lie algebra-valued 1-form

AΩ 1(P,𝔤)A\in \Omega^1(P, \mathfrak{g})

on P satisfying two conditions

  1. first Ehresmann condition

    for every x𝔤 we have

    ι ρ *(x)A=x.\iota_{\rho_*(x)} A = x \,.
  2. second Ehresmann condition

    for every x𝔤 we have

    ρ *(x)A=ad xA,\mathcal{L}_{\rho_*(x)} A = ad_x A \,,

    where ρ *(x) is the Lie derivative along ρ *(x) and where ad x:𝔤𝔤 is the adjoint action of 𝔤 on itself.

Proposition

This is equivalent to

  1. first Ehresmann condition

    for every x𝔤 we have

    ι ρ *(x)A=x.\iota_{\rho_*(x)} A = x \,.
  2. second Ehresmann condition

    for every x𝔤 we have

    ι ρ *(x)F A=0,\iota_{\rho_*(x)} F_A = 0 \,,

    where F AΩ 2(P,𝔤) is the curvature 2-form of A.

Proof

Using ι xA=x we have by Cartan calculus

ι ρ *(x)F A =ι ρ *(x)d dRA+12[AA] = ρ *(x)Ad dRι ρ *(x)A+[x,A] = ρ *(x)A+[x,A].\begin{aligned} \iota_{\rho_*(x)} F_A &= \iota_{\rho_*(x)} d_{dR} A + \frac{1}{2}[A\wedge A] \\ & = \mathcal{L}_{\rho_*(x)} A - d_{dR} \iota_{\rho_*(x)} A + [x,A] \\ & = \mathcal{L}_{\rho_*(x)} A + [x,A] \,. \end{aligned}

In terms of distributions

Given a smooth bundle π:EX with typical fiber F (e.g. a smooth vectir bundle or a smooth principal G-bundle), there is a well defined vector subbundle VETE over E such that V p consists of the tangent vectors v p such that (T pπ)(v p)=0. A smooth distribution (field) of horizontal subspaces is a choice of a vector subspace H pET pE for every p such that

E1. (complementarity) T uE=H uEV uE

E2. pH pE is smooth. That means that in the unique decomposition of any smooth vector field X on E into vector fields X HΓ(H uE) and X VΓ(V uE) such that X=X H+X V the vector field X H is smooth (or equivalently X V is smooth, or equivalently both) as a section of TE (there exist yet several other equivalent formulations of the smooothness criterium).

An Ehresmann connection describes a connection on a G-principal bundle π:PX (for G some Lie group) in terms of a distribution of horizontal subspaces HTP which is a subbundle of the tangent bundle of P complementary at each point to the vertical tangent bundle to the fiber. More precisely, an Ehresmann connection on a principal G-bundle π:PX is a smooth distribution of horizontal subspaces pH pP which is equivariant:

E3. H pgP=(T pR g)H pP for every pP and gG.

This subbundle H= pH pTX over X can be expressed as a field of subspaces H x=KerA x=AnnA xTP (xP) which are pointwise annihilators of a smooth Lie algebra-valued 1-form AΩ 1(P,Lie(G)) on P that satisfies two Ehresmann conditions from the previous subsection.

The Ehresmann connections on a principal G-bundle are in 1-1 correspondence with an appropriate notion of a connection on the associated bundle. Namely, if T HPTP is the smooth horizontal distrubution of subspaces defining the principal connection on a principal G-bundle P over X, where G is a Lie group and F a smooth left G-space, then consider the total space P× GF of the associated bundle with typical fiber F. Then, for a fixed fF one defines a map ρ f:PP× GF assigning the class [p,f] to pP. If (T pρ f)(T p HP)=:T [p,f] HP× GF defines the horizontal subspace T [p,f] HP× GFT [p,f]P× GF, the collection of such subspaces does not depend on the choice of (p,f) in the class [p,f], and the correspondence pT [p,f] HP× GF is a connection on the associated bundle P× GFX.

Properties

General

Definition

The two definitions in terms of 1-forms and in terms of horizontal distributions are equivalent.

Proof

At each pP take the horizontal subspace H pP to be the kernel of A(p):T pP𝔤

H pP:=kerA(p)H_p P := ker A(p)
Remark

This means we may think of A as measuring how infinitesimal paths in P fail to be horizontal or parallel to X in the sense of parallel transport.

Curvature characteristic forms

Let W(𝔤) be an invariant polynomial on the Lie algebra. For AOmega 1(P,𝔤) an Ehresmann connection, write

F A=F AF AF A\langle F_A \rangle = \langle F_A \wedge F_A \wedge \cdots F_A\rangle

for the curvature characteristic form obtained by evaluating this on wedge powers of the curvature 2-form.

Proposition

The forms F AΩ 2k(P) are closed, descend along p:PX, in that they are pullbacks of forms along p, and their class in de Rham cohomology H 2k(X) are independent of the choice of A on P.

Proof

That the forms are closed follows from the Bianchi identity

dF A=[AF A]d F_A = [A\wedge F_A]

satisfied by the curvature 2-form and the defining as-invariance of . More abstractly, the 1-form A itself may be identified with a morphism of dg-algebras out of the Weil algebra W(𝔤) (see there)

Ω (P)W(𝔤):A\Omega^\bullet(P) \leftarrow W(\mathfrak{g}) : A

and the evaluation of the curvature in the invariant polynomials corresponds to the precomposition with the morphism

W(𝔤)CE(b 2k1):W(\mathfrak{g}) \leftarrow CE(b^{2k-1}\mathbb{R} ) : \langle - \rangle

described at ∞-Lie algebra cohomology.

to show that these forms descend, it is sufficient to show that for all x𝔤 we have

  1. ι ρ *(X)F A=0

  2. ρ *(x)F A=0

The first follows from ι ρ *(x)F A=0. The second from this, the d dR-closure just discussed and Cartan's magic formula for the Lie derivative.

Remark

The form F A is called the curvature characteristic form of the connection A. The map

inv(𝔤)Ω (X)\inv(\mathfrak{g}) \to \Omega^\bullet(X)

induced by (P,A) as above is the Chern-Weil homomorphism.

Note on terminology

The terminology for the various incarnations of the single notion of connection on a bundle varies throughout the literature. What we here call an Ehresmann connection is sometimes, but not always, called principal connection (as it is defined for principal bundles).

References

The original definition is due to

  • Charles Ehresmann, Les connexions infinitésimale dans une espace fibré différentiable, Colloque de Topologie, Bruxelles (1950) 29-55, MR0042768

See also

  • Nakahara, Mikio: Geometry, topology and physics (ZMATH entry)

A formulation and discussion of Ehresmann connections using language and tools from synthetic differential geometry is in section 6 of