nLab
2-site

This entry is about the notion of site in 2-category theory. For the notion “bisite” of a 1-categorical site equipped with two coverages see instead separated presheaf.

Contents

Idea

The notion of 2-site is the generalization of the notion of site to the higher category theory of 2-categories (bicategories).

Over a 2-site one has a 2-topos of 2-sheaves.

Definition

A coverage on a 2-category C consists of, for each object UC, a collection of families (f i:U iU) i of morphisms with codomain U, called covering families, such that

  • If (f i:U iU) i is a covering family and g:VU is a morphism, then there exists a covering family (h j:V jV) j such that each composite gh j factors through some f i, up to isomorphism.

This is the 2-categorical analogue of the 1-categorical notion of coverage introduced in the Elephant.

A 2-category equipped with a coverage is called a 2-site.

Examples

  • If C is a regular 2-category, then the collection of all singleton families (f:VU), where f is eso, forms a coverage called the regular coverage.

  • Likewise, if C is a coherent 2-category, the collection of all finite jointly-eso families forms a coverage called the coherent coverage.

  • On Cat, the canonical coverage consists of all families that are jointly essentially surjective on objects.

Saturation conditions

A pre-Grothendieck coverage on a 2-category is a coverage satisfying the following additional conditions:

  • If f:VU is an equivalence, then the one-element family (f:VU) is a covering family.

  • If (f i:U iU) iI is a covering family and for each i, so is (h ij:U ijU i) jJ i, then (f ih ij:U ijU) iI,jU i is also a covering family.

This is the 2-categorical version of a Grothendieck pretopology (minus the common condition of having actual pullbacks).

Now, a sieve on an object UC is defined to be a functor R:C opCat with a transformation RC(,U) which is objectwise fully faithful (equivalently, it is a fully faithful morphism in [C op,Cat]). Equivalently, it may be defined as a subcategory of the slice 2-category C/U which is closed under precomposition with all morphisms of C.

Every family (f i:U iU) i generates a sieve by defining R(V) to be the full subcategory of C(V,U) on those g:VU such that gf ih for some i and some h:VU i. The following observation is due to StreetCBS.

Lemma

A 2-presheaf X:C opCat is a 2-sheaf for a covering family (f i:U iU) i if and only if

X(U)[C op,Cat](C(,U),X)[C op,Cat](R,X)X(U) \simeq[C^{op},Cat](C(-,U),X) \to [C^{op},Cat](R,X)

is an equivalence, where R is the sieve on U generated by (f i:U iU) i.

Therefore, just as in the 1-categorical case, it is natural to restrict attention to covering sieves. We define a Grothendieck coverage on a 2-category C to consist of, for each object U, a collection of sieves on U called covering sieves, such that

  • If R is a covering sieve on U and g:VU is any morphism, then g *(R) is a covering sieve on V.

  • For each U the sieve M U consisting of all morphisms into U (the sieve generated by the singleton family (1 U)) is a covering sieve.

  • If R is a covering sieve on U and S is an arbitrary sieve on U such that for each f:VU in R, f *(S) is a covering sieve on V, then S is also a covering sieve on U.

Here if R is a sieve on U and g:VU is a morphism, g *(R) denotes the sieve on V consisting of all morphisms h into V such that gh factors, up to isomorphism, through some morphism in R.

As in the 1-categorical case, one can then show that every coverage generates a unique Grothendieck coverage having the same 2-sheaves.

Properties

References

Strict 2-sites were considered in

Bicategorical 2-sites in

See also StreetCBS.

More discussion is in

Revised on March 9, 2012 19:22:24 by Urs Schreiber (82.113.106.131)